Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05-12-10 | Houston Astros v. St. Louis Cardinals UNDER 8 | Top | 9-6 | Loss | -107 | 12 h 9 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-12-10 | Athletics(Oakland) v. Rangers(Texas) UNDER 9 | Top | 1-10 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 58 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-12-10 | Mariners(Seattle) v. Orioles(Baltimore) UNDER 8.5 | Top | 2-5 | Win | 100 | 8 h 47 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-12-10 | Rays(TampaBay) v. Angels(LAA) UNDER 8 | Top | 4-3 | Win | 100 | 8 h 46 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-12-10 | WhiteSox(Chicago) v. Twins(Minnesota) UNDER 8 | Top | 2-3 | Win | 100 | 2 h 50 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-12-10 | Reds(Cincinnati) v. Pirates(Pittsburgh) UNDER 8.5 | Top | 5-0 | Win | 100 | 1 h 14 m | Show |
It has become very evident in major league baseball this season that lefthand pitching has become superior, and teams in general are having a lot more difficulty generating runs vs lefthand pitching, than righthand pitching. There are 22 of 30 teams that average more runs scored per game vs righties than lefties. Overall thru May 11th, that has led to the unders prevailing to a 157-122 mark if at least 1 lefthand pitcher starts the game, or 56.3% of the time, a decided winning advantage. When you eliminate the 5 teams that have scored at least a half run more a game vs lefties, that winning percentage jumps to 140-95, or just about 60% to the under. This game qualifies as a system under play.
|
|||||||
05-06-10 | Atlanta Hawks v. Orlando Magic OVER 189.5 | Top | 98-112 | Win | 100 | 26 h 31 m | Show |
This is called OVER in 2 x 2:
Play over in the 2nd game of the 2nd round of the NBA playoffs. This has been 23-5 ATS since the expansion of the first round in 2003 to a best of 7. It often generates unders in game 1 (17-11), as teams feel each other out. Game 2 features a typically lowered total from game 1, but teams scheme on how they are being defended in game 1, and come with better offensive plans. The 23 wins in the 28 games feature the following facts: 16 of the 23 overs went over the total by 10 points or more No year has ever been worse than 2-2 3 of the 7 years have featured a perfect 4-0 mark to the over The 23 overs have combined to eclise the total by 285.5 points, or by 12.4 points per game. Last year the closest one was 13.5 points TONIGHT: ATLANTA/ORLANDO OVER! |
|||||||
05-04-10 | Utah Jazz v. Los Angeles Lakers OVER 199 | Top | 103-111 | Win | 100 | 16 h 1 m | Show |
This has been 23-5 ATS since the expansion of the first round in 2003 to a best of 7. It often generates unders in game 1 (17-11), as teams feel each other out. Game 2 features a typically lowered total from game 1, but teams scheme on how they are being defended in game 1, and come with better offensive plans. The 23 wins in the 28 games feature the following facts:
16 of the 23 overs went over the total by 10 points or more No year has ever been worse than 2-2 3 of the 7 years have featured a perfect 4-0 mark to the over The 23 overs have combined to eclise the total by 285.5 points, or by 12.4 points per game. Last year the closest one was 13.5 points TONIGHT: OVER IN THIS ONE |
|||||||
05-03-10 | Boston Celtics v. Cleveland Cavaliers OVER 192.5 | Top | 104-86 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 54 m | Show |
This is called OVER in 2 x 2:
Play over in the 2nd game of the 2nd round of the NBA playoffs. This has been 23-5 ATS since the expansion of the first round in 2003 to a best of 7. It often generates unders in game 1 (17-11), as teams feel each other out. Game 2 features a typically lowered total from game 1, but teams scheme on how they are being defended in game 1, and come with better offensive plans. The 23 wins in the 28 games feature the following facts: 16 of the 23 overs went over the total by 10 points or more No year has ever been worse than 2-2 3 of the 7 years have featured a perfect 4-0 mark to the over The 23 overs have combined to eclise the total by 285.5 points, or by 12.4 points per game. Last year the closest one was 13.5 points TONIGHT: BOSTON/CLEVE OVER 192.5 |
|||||||
05-02-10 | Milwaukee Bucks v. Atlanta Hawks OVER 185.5 | Top | 74-95 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 31 m | Show |
Nothing will push the value to one side as fast as a game where both teams shoot 35% combined from the field, and end up producing just 152 total points. That has forced the oddsmakers hands into placing the total or this one lower than any of the previous 6 games in this series. The Hawks have played 10 of their last 14 vs a team with a winning record to the over, while Milwaukee has played over to a 10-3 mark in their last 13 vs a team with a winning record, then there is a huge 27-4 trend pointing to the over here as well. Game 7 goes over the total.
|
|||||||
04-30-10 | Denver Nuggets v. Utah Jazz UNDER 217.5 | Top | 104-112 | Win | 100 | 16 h 52 m | Show |
This series has sure seen some scoring, but the oddsmakers have now priced the value on the otherside. This series opened to a game 1 total of 208, and has now risen a full 9 points from what was considered a fair price in game 1 on this very same court. The Nuggets have played to a 38-18 mark to the under in their last 56 posted as a dog, as well as a 21-8 mark to the under in the quarterfinals. The last 7 meetings between these clubs played in Utah has produced 5 unders as well. This one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
04-28-10 | Utah Jazz v. Denver Nuggets UNDER 215 | Top | 102-116 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 14 m | Show |
The oddsmakers opened this total for game 1 at 208. What has happened is 3 overs and 1 under have driven the price up to 215, and despite the 7 point tax, 65% of the public sees this one going over the total. Utah has had 13 games on the road this season vs teams that average 102ppg or more, and the results have shown them playing under in 9 of the 13. The games have averaged scoring just 203ppg. Denver has now been 21-7 to the under in their last 28 quarterfinal playoff games. Under gets the call.
|
|||||||
04-28-10 | Milwaukee Bucks v. Atlanta Hawks UNDER 190.5 | Top | 91-87 | Win | 100 | 12 h 42 m | Show |
The total has creeped up to the 190s in this one after 3 of the first 4 playing to the over. This one presents a great opportunity, with a 61% system that has nearly 500 games in the data set! Milwaukee has now also become a solid under team following a game where they allowed 100+ points, as they have followed by going 9-4 to the under in their last 13. This one has value with the added points, and lots of signals that say to play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
04-26-10 | Hawks(Atlanta) v. Bucks(Milwaukee) UNDER 190 | Top | 104-111 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 53 m | Show |
This is a huge spot for a system that has rocked the books over the last 14 years of NBA first round action. When you get to game 4 of the sries, and the posted total is in the 190s, it has been a historic under spot, and the books have failed to make the necessary adjustment. This situation since 1996 has seen the under prevail to the tune of 32-8. That is an 80% cover rate over a 14 year period. I will go with the longterm trend, and play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
04-25-10 | Dallas Mavericks v. San Antonio Spurs UNDER 193 | Top | 89-92 | Win | 100 | 13 h 16 m | Show |
This is a huge spot for a system that has rocked the books over the last 14 years of NBA first round action. When you get to game 4 of the sries, and the posted total is in the 190s, it has been a historic under spot, and the books have failed to make the necessary adjustment. This situation since 1996 has seen the under prevail to the tune of 32-8. That is an 80% cover rate over a 14 year period. I will go with the longterm trend, and play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
04-25-10 | Cleveland Cavaliers v. Chicago Bulls UNDER 194 | Top | 121-98 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 47 m | Show |
This is a huge spot for a system that has rocked the books over the last 14 years of NBA first round action. When you get to game 4 of the sries, and the posted total is in the 190s, it has been a historic under spot, and the books have failed to make the necessary adjustment. This situation since 1996 has seen the under prevail to the tune of 32-8. That is an 80% cover rate over a 14 year period. I will go with the longterm trend, and play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
04-24-10 | Atlanta Hawks v. Milwaukee Bucks UNDER 187 | Top | 89-107 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 8 m | Show |
The Atlanta Hawks have opened a comfortable 2-0 series lead vs the Bucks. This becomes a huge game for Milwaukee looking down the barrel of down 3-0 with a loss. That usually means the defensive end of the court gets the attention, and the Bucks have done well on the defenisve end all season. The Hawks are a notoriously poor offensive team on the road in the playoffs. Their last 4 playoff appearances, covering 15 road games sees their highest output at 87 points! The 15 game average stands at just 77.1ppg. The average over the last 2 years is a very similar 77.3ppg. They have played under in 7 of their last 8 as a playoff dog. I'm going with the under in this one.
|
|||||||
04-24-10 | Orlando Magic v. Charlotte Bobcats OVER 184.5 | Top | 90-86 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 9 m | Show |
The Charlotte Bobcats led the NBA in fewest points allowed this season, but it wasn't a very defensve year in the NBA. They allowed 93.8ppg which is the highest amount over more than 15 years in the NBA for a team to lead in this catergory. The fact is when they played the top 8 teams in terms of scoring offense at home the games went over the total in 6 of the 8 played, with an average total points scored of 197. I like this one to go over the total.
|
|||||||
04-23-10 | Denver Nuggets v. Utah Jazz UNDER 216 | Top | 93-105 | Win | 100 | 14 h 8 m | Show |
Looking at the Utah offense, and this Denver offense, makes it look like an easy over play here, but I disagree. This series started with a fair line of 208 for a game 1 total, and it has shot up to 216. Now the venue changes, and so will the scores. The last 2 years these teams have played to an average total points scored of 224.3ppg in Denver, and just 200.5ppg in Utah. The Nuggets in the playoffs the last 6 years have played to a 9-10 mark at home to the over, and on the road they have been 3-15 to the over. Last year the Jazz played their opening 2 games on the road vs the Lakers, and the game both went over, and averaged 220.5ppg. They came home to play to a rising total, but the final score was 88-86. Denver has also played to a 21-6 mark to the under in their last 27 as a playoff dog. Denver is 34-15 to the under in their last 49 as a dog. Denver is also 8-0 to the under after 2 straight games with a combined score of over 215 points. Utah has played to 51 totals in home games over the last 2 years with the under prevailing 32-19. Utah is 69-41 to the under in all playoff games since 1996! UNDER IS MY NBA PLAYOFF GAME OF THE YEAR!!!!!
|
|||||||
04-23-10 | Boston Celtics v. Miami Heat OVER 182 | Top | 100-98 | Win | 100 | 10 h 29 m | Show |
The Heat offense through the first 2 games has been horrible. They have played 8 quarters, with 4 of them totalling 53 points, or 13.25 per quarter. We have seen this before, laying an egg last year vs Atlanta scoring just 64 points, then coming back for 108, and 107 in the next 2. The Celtics weren't exactly stellar defensively on the road a year ago, where they averaged allowing 105ppg. Celts have played over to a 21-10-1 mark off 2 days rest, and Heat 5 of 6 off a straight up loss. This one goes over the total.
|
|||||||
04-22-10 | Milwaukee Brewers v. Pittsburgh Pirates UNDER 9 | Top | 20-0 | Loss | -100 | 4 h 45 m | Show |
The Pittsburgh Pirates have really struggled against lefthand pitching in recent times. It has led them down a path laden with unders as they are now 41-18-1 to the under in their last 60 games vs a lefthand pitcher. That includes a mark to the under of 21-6 at home vs a lefthand starter. They have also closed their last 36 series that were 3 games by going 24-11-1 to the under. The Brew Crew has played under to a 12-3-2 mark in their last 17 on the road, says this one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
04-20-10 | Oklahoma City Thunder v. Los Angeles Lakers UNDER 189 | Top | 92-95 | Win | 100 | 15 h 19 m | Show |
The oddsmakers have added vakue on this total by shaving it 8 full points off the closing number in game one which was 197. Why is a fair number plaaced on a total 197 but now considered 189? A low scoring game will do that. The Lakers have reached the 100 point marl in 20 of their last 27 home playoff games. They have averaged 103.5ppg at home in their next home playoff game following a game under 100 at home. The Lajers will win here, as #1 & 2 seeds are 76-8 at home in the first round. Lakers on the moneyline.
|
|||||||
04-20-10 | Tampa Bay Rays v. Chicago White Sox UNDER 8 | Top | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 13 h 55 m | Show |
John Danks allowed 2 runs or less in 17 of his starts a year ago, and 15 of his last 22 starts failed to reach the total. David Price in his 25 major league starts has allowed 2 runs or less in 15 of them. That makes these pitchers a combined 47 starts allowing 2 or fewer runs in 30 of the 47 or 64% of the time. Certainly offers value on the under here. Tampa Bay has also been 19-5-2 to the under in their last 26 vs the AL Central. These teams have played 20 to the under in their last 27 games vs each other, including the last 6 played in Chicago. I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
04-19-10 | Chicago Bulls v. Cleveland Cavaliers OVER 191 | Top | 102-112 | Win | 100 | 14 h 40 m | Show |
The Cleveland Cave went through an 8 minute scoring drought in game 1, which made the game look like a big defensive struggle. I would expect the Cavs to remain focused for 48 minutes here after their 3rd quarter dive in game 1. The Bulls are 7-1 to the over in their last 8 as a dog, and that includes 6-0 in this range of pointspread. Cavs have gone over 9-3-1 following an ATS win. I look for the Cavs to pour it on here, to take a 2-0 series lead heading to the road for game 3, and I like this game to go OVER the total.
|
|||||||
04-18-10 | Oklahoma City Thunder v. Los Angeles Lakers OVER 197 | Top | 79-87 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 10 m | Show |
There have been a lot of mismatches in the NBA 1st round of the playoffs, but there is also something that has evolved since the 1st round went to a best of 7 game format. That change and the pairings of great vs mediocre, has led to a lot of high scoring games in the first round when the #1 seed is playing at home. Since the change, which has now 38 games in the database, the #1 seed at home has played to the over to the tune of a 66% winning rate. I'll back the over in this one.
|
|||||||
04-17-10 | Chicago Bulls v. Cleveland Cavaliers OVER 192.5 | Top | 83-96 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 7 m | Show |
There have been a lot of mismatches in the NBA 1st round of the playoffs, but there is also something that has evolved since the 1st round went to a best of 7 game format. That change and the pairings of great vs mediocre, has led to a lot of high scoring games in the first round when the #1 seed is playing at home. Since the change, which has now 38 games in the database, the #1 seed at home has played to the over to the tune of a 66% winning rate. I'll back the over in this one.
|
|||||||
04-16-10 | Reds(Cincinnati) v. Pirates(Pittsburgh) OVER 8.5 | Top | 3-4 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 49 m | Show |
Pirate offense has produced a lot better at home, and despite 6 of their first 9 on the road, the Pirates are still plating 4.33 runs a game. The problem has been on the mound, where the starters and pen have been horrible, allowing 65 runs therough 9 games, or 7.2 a contest. Reds have played up and over as a road dog to the tune of an 8-2 over mark in their last 10, Duke has been 7-0 to the over in his last 7 starts, and also 5-2-1 to the over in his last 8 vs the Reds. I'll back the over n this one.
|
|||||||
04-14-10 | Indiana Pacers v. Washington Wizards UNDER 213 | Top | 97-98 | Win | 100 | 13 h 54 m | Show |
It has been another trying year for the Washington Wizards, and they traded away key scoring ingredients, which hasn't made it any easier. They also lost Josh Howard, the key player they got in return. They have closed the season by playing to a 26-9 under mark, and I don't see the finale going any differently. The Pacres saw their 4 game winning streak come to an end at home vs Orlando, where they scored just 98 points, and playing the finale on the road, doesn't present them bringing their "A" game to this one. Pacers 9-2 to the under vs teams under .400, and I like the under here.
|
|||||||
04-14-10 | Chicago Bulls v. Charlotte Bobcats UNDER 189.5 | Top | 98-89 | Win | 100 | 13 h 52 m | Show |
The Charlotte Bobcats have accomplished something and it probably is known by few. They are the best team in the NBA in terms of points allowed per game. It has allowed them to play to a 9-3 mark to the under in their last 12 games on 1 day rest, and 9-4 to the under facing an opponent off a 100+ offensive game, and 6-1 to the under as a dog. The Bulls have been a huge under team as a road favorite where they have posted a 9-1 mark to the under in their last 10 in this situation. I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
04-13-10 | Sacramento Kings v. Los Angeles Lakers UNDER 198.5 | Top | 100-106 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 19 m | Show |
The Sacramento Kings don't play very offensive on the road vs the good teams. Their last 12 in this situation shows them scoring 100+ just 2 times, and the average stands at just 91.7ppg. The Lakers have not been an explosive offensive team down the stretch themselves, as they have averaged just 94.1ppg over their last 11. Kings have failed to play to the over in all of their last 7 on the road, while the Lakers have been 21-8 to the under over their last 29 games. I'll play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
04-12-10 | Orlando Magic v. Indiana Pacers OVER 209.5 | Top | 118-98 | Win | 100 | 12 h 58 m | Show |
The Indiana Pacers have done a good job at home this season, and down the stretch they have played fast and loose, and the result has been 119.3ppg in their last 4. Over their last 13 home games the Pacers are putting up 109.5ppg. Pacers have played over to an 11-4-1 mark in their last 16 as a home dog. The Orlando Magic are at 109ppg in their last 5, and have played over to a 5-1 mark in their last 6 with no rest, with the 5 games going over averaging 228ppg. I'll play this one over the total.
|
|||||||
04-10-10 | Boston Celtics v. Milwaukee Bucks UNDER 190 | Top | 105-90 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 41 m | Show |
The Milwaukee Bucks have had the hot hand, and in their last 14 home games, just one team has reached the century mark, and that was the Sixers who put up 101. The Bucks over the course of the 14 games are allowing a stingy 90.9ppg on their home hardwood. The Bucks have only reached the 100 point mark 25 times all season without overtime, so this figures to play like the last one, that finished with 170 total points scored. Bucks on a 35-15-1 under mark in their last 51 vs the East. This one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
04-09-10 | Memphis Grizzlies v. San Antonio Spurs UNDER 200 | Top | 107-99 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 4 m | Show |
The Spurs had a stretch this season where they were uncharacteristically offensive. That has settled down as the playoffs approach and the Spurs have averaged less than 100 over their last 10 games. They have also clamped down on the defensive end allowing jist 92.9ppg in their last 10. Grizzlies last 6 include 2 overtime games, but the reality is in regulation minutes they have scored just 95ppg. They have had lots of problems scoring against winning teams, and are subsequently 21-10 to the under in their last 31 vs a team with a winning record. The Spurs as a favorite of 5-10.5 points are a perfect 6-0 to the under. This series has also gone 22-10 to the under in the last 32 meetings. Under gets the call.
|
|||||||
04-09-10 | Cleveland Indians v. Detroit Tigers UNDER 9 | Top | 2-5 | Win | 100 | 7 h 38 m | Show |
The Cleveland Indians have a pitcher in David Huff that improved tremendously down the stretch a year ago with a 2.18 ERA in his last 6 starts. He should continue to improve this season. The Tigers Rick Porcello could be an All-Star caliber pitcher this season. He allowed 3 runs or lss in 11 of his last 13 starts. Tribe on an 8 series run of playing game 1 to the under, and Tigers at 8-2-1 to the under with a total of 9-10.5. Under prevailing in 5 of the last 7 in this series. I'll play the under here.
|
|||||||
04-02-10 | Utah Jazz v. Los Angeles Lakers OVER 204 | Top | 92-106 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 54 m | Show |
Over the last 40 games, the Utah Jazz has been one of the best teams in the NBA. The Jazz have put together a 31-9 mark in those 40 games, and the offense has been clicking in a big way. Over their last 18 games, the Jazz
|
|||||||
03-22-10 | Dayton v. Cincinnati UNDER 127 | Top | 81-66 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 2 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-22-10 | Toronto Raptors v. Minnesota Timberwolves UNDER 218.5 | Top | 106-100 | Win | 100 | 13 h 38 m | Show |
The Toronto Raptors have now been given Golden St. and Phoenix status when it comes to high totals, with this one approaching the 220 mark. The problem is the Raptors are averaging under 100ppg over their last 13. Likewise, the Minnesota Timberwolves, over their last 8 home games, have averaged less than 100ppg. This isn't the typical scenerio seen in generating a very lofty total, as we have posted for this one, and the oddsmakers are in error here. T-Wolves have played under to a 26-12-1 mark in their last 37 as a home dog. I'll play this one under the total
|
|||||||
03-21-10 | Cornell v. Wisconsin UNDER 121.5 | Top | 87-69 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 0 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-21-10 | Michigan State v. Maryland UNDER 143 | Top | 85-83 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 41 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-20-10 | St Mary's CA v. Villanova OVER 153 | Top | 75-68 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 6 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-19-10 | Cornell v. Temple UNDER 119 | Top | 78-65 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 50 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. MISSOURI gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-18-10 | San Diego State v. Tennessee OVER 126 | Top | 59-62 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 11 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-18-10 | Texas El Paso v. Butler OVER 130 | Top | 59-77 | Win | 100 | 11 h 15 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-17-10 | IUPUI v. Hofstra OVER 142 | Top | 74-60 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 39 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-17-10 | Coll Charleston v. Eastern Kentucky OVER 146.5 | Top | 82-79 | Win | 100 | 13 h 38 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-16-10 | Cleveland Cavaliers v. Detroit Pistons UNDER 195.5 | Top | 113-101 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 56 m | Show |
The oddsmakers just don't seem to get it when these clubs get together. It is typically an all out defensive war, and the games rarely score as many points as expected. The last 24 games played in this series have seen just 2 go over the total, without overtime involved, and this one is set way to high. To top that off the Pistons are 31-8 to the under in their last 39 games vs a team with a winning record. This one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
03-16-10 | Northeastern v. Connecticut OVER 124.5 | Top | 57-59 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 20 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area, and the play is on the OVER
|
|||||||
03-16-10 | Western Carolina v. Marshall OVER 150 | Top | 88-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 15 m | Show |
Post-season tournaments leave a trail as to tendencies, and how they change from the regular season, and even post-season conference tournaments. Taking a snapshot of the trail they leave behind offers value in given areas, and a place and time to exploit these situations as they arise. I have years of data and have found many places where these situations can be taken advantage of and will post them as they arise. This game fits into that area. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-13-10 | Illinois v. Ohio State UNDER 127 | Top | 81-88 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 27 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-13-10 | Tennessee v. Kentucky UNDER 139 | Top | 45-74 | Win | 100 | 7 h 44 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | Massachusetts v. Richmond UNDER 132 | Top | 72-77 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 23 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | Western Michigan v. Akron OVER 134 | Top | 64-66 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 54 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | Dayton v. Xavier UNDER 134.5 | Top | 73-78 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 23 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | Houston v. Southern Mississippi UNDER 134 | Top | 74-66 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 22 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | Rhode Island v. St Louis UNDER 128.5 | Top | 63-47 | Win | 100 | 8 h 15 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-12-10 | St Bonaventure v. Temple UNDER 123 | Top | 51-69 | Win | 100 | 6 h 48 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | Penn State v. Minnesota UNDER 127 | Top | 55-76 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 39 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | Indiana v. Northwestern UNDER 134.5 | Top | 58-73 | Win | 100 | 11 h 2 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | Boise State v. Utah State OVER 133.5 | Top | 60-84 | Win | 100 | 9 h 0 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | Miami Florida v. Wake Forest UNDER 135 | Top | 83-62 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 27 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | South Carolina v. Alabama UNDER 135 | Top | 63-68 | Win | 100 | 7 h 3 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gts the call.
|
|||||||
03-11-10 | Virginia v. Boston College UNDER 123.5 | Top | 68-62 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 6 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-10-10 | Central Florida v. SMU UNDER 122 | Top | 69-53 | Push | 0 | 14 h 26 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-10-10 | Utah Jazz v. Detroit Pistons UNDER 201 | Top | 115-104 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 28 m | Show |
The Detroit Pistons are a fragment of what they were just a few short years ago. There is however one thing that has stayed status quo with this team, and that is their willingnes to defend, especially at home. The Pistons have not allowed any team to score more than 105 points on them at home this season. They have played 10 games vs the top 11 teams in points scored per game at home, and no game has topped the 200 mark, and no team has scored 100!!! That makes this a tough spot to top the total, especially when the combined scores in all 10 of those games has failed to top the 200 point mark. Under gets the call here.
|
|||||||
03-10-10 | Rice v. Tulsa UNDER 128 | Top | 62-73 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 51 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-10-10 | Tulane v. Southern Mississippi UNDER 116 | Top | 47-57 | Win | 100 | 8 h 17 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call
|
|||||||
03-10-10 | East Carolina v. Houston OVER 151 | Top | 80-93 | Win | 100 | 6 h 44 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. OVER gets the call
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Sacramento Kings v. Portland Trail Blazers OVER 198 | Top | 81-88 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 24 m | Show |
The Sacramento Kings have not played much defense, especially on the road, where they have allowed 12 of their last 15 opponents to top the 100 mark. The Blazers took 20 games to score 100 points 7 times, before their recent run of 7 straight over the century mark, so this team is clicking on the offensive end of the court right now. Kings are also 11-4 to the over in their last 15 on 1 day rest, while the Blazers are now 11-5 to the over after a loss. I'll play this one over the total.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Boston Celtics v. Milwaukee Bucks UNDER 188 | Top | 84-86 | Win | 100 | 12 h 23 m | Show |
The Boston Celtics were rolling along through 27 games, offense was scoring 100+ in 16 of those first 27 games, then the wheels fell off. It looks like this team aged overnight. They have reached the century mark in ust 9 of their last 29 games. The saving grace of late is a defense that has allowed just83ppg in their last 3. The Bucks have long last finally put things together and are 15-4 over their last 19 games. The biggest reason is holding 12 of their last 19 opponents in the 80s or less. The Bucks are now 20-6 to the under vs the Eastern Conference in their last 26, while the Celtics playing on the road vs a team with a home winning percentage of over .600 are 32-15 to the under in their last 47. I'll go under in this one.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Pennsylvania v. Princeton UNDER 113 | Top | 56-68 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 15 m | Show |
The Princeton Tigers are back as a good team in the Ivy. When they have had their good teams, totals used to be in the 90s, or low 100s, but that has not been the case this season, despite the fact the Tigers have played 13 Ivy league games with the average total points at 107.4ppg. Just 3 of their games have topped the 110 mark this season, and the result has been a 10-3 under mark. The Quakers are 5-1 to the under in Ivy road play with an average of 115ppg being scored. Tigers now 22-6 to the under in their last 28 Ivy games, I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Miami Heat v. Charlotte Bobcats UNDER 185 | Top | 78-83 | Win | 100 | 11 h 21 m | Show |
The Miami Heat have really struggled with their offense on the road. The Heat over their last 11 road games are averaging just 89.8ppg. It has led to an 8-2-1 mark to the under. Their last time in Charlotte saw them produce a woeful 65 points. The Bobcats went through a 17 game stretch averaging over 100 points a game, but that has been lost. That has been replaced by an offense that has scored 93.2ppg in their last 15, with each of their last 5 failing to reach the total. Miami is now 27-10 to the under off a straight up win, while 5 of the last 6 meetings between these clubs have fallen short of the total. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | George Washington v. Dayton UNDER 126.5 | Top | 60-70 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 14 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Providence v. Seton Hall UNDER 166 | Top | 106-109 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 10 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-09-10 | Duquesne v. St Bonaventure OVER 154 | Top | 71-83 | Push | 0 | 11 h 9 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. OVER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-07-10 | Los Angeles Lakers v. Orlando Magic UNDER 195 | Top | 94-96 | Win | 100 | 8 h 26 m | Show |
The Lakers are considered by most a very offensive minded team, but that has not bee the case this season, especially of late. The Lakers over their last 17 games have averaged less than 100 points a game not including overtime minutes, and when you take out their 2 games vs highly offensive teams in Indiana, and Denver where they scored 113, and 122, the Lakers are averaging under 96ppg. The Magic have posted great defensive numbers at home over their last 13 home games allowing just 91ppg. They have allowed 100+ at home just 3 times in their last 27 games. Lakers enter with a 26-10 mark to the under in their last 36 off a straight up loss, and 8-1 to the under in their last 9 as a dog, while the Magic stand at 20-6 to the under in their last 26 as a favorite, and 45-18 under off 1 day rest. Last 7 meetings have also produced 6 unders. I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
03-06-10 | Indiana Pacers v. Phoenix Suns UNDER 221 | Top | 105-113 | Win | 100 | 15 h 33 m | Show |
This is a game between two teams with tired legs. For Phoenix it will be their 5th game in 7 days, and for Indiana it will be their 3rd road game in 5 days. That often spells trouble at the offensive end. The Pacers are also in a highly predictive situation, as they are a poor defensive team off a blowout loss. NBA teams that allow 103ppg or more, and off a 20 point or more loss, have stiffened up on the defensive end in their next game producing a 106-58 mark to the under in their next game. I'll play this one under the total.
|
|||||||
03-06-10 | Los Angeles Clippers v. Utah Jazz UNDER 206 | Top | 85-107 | Win | 100 | 15 h 32 m | Show |
The Utah Jazz have now played 6 straight to the over, and when streaks start building the public notices, as do the oddsmakers who begin to pad the lines, creating value on the otherside. These teams met less than a week ago to a total of 202, so already 4 points added. Good teams in this situation, have produced a 122-68 mark to the under in the last 190 occurances, or 64.2% of the time in almost 200 games. This one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
03-06-10 | South Alabama v. Florida Atlantic OVER 142.5 | Top | 52-51 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 0 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. OVER gets the call Rank #1
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Indiana State v. Illinois State UNDER 129.5 | Top | 65-69 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 18 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | James Madison v. Drexel UNDER 127 | Top | 77-65 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 9 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Detroit Pistons v. Cleveland Cavaliers UNDER 199.5 | Top | 92-99 | Win | 100 | 13 h 46 m | Show |
This is one of the ugliest series between any two teams in the entire NBA. These teams have played some of the ugliest defensive games over the years, and ugly translates to defense in the NBA. This is a heated and hated rivalry, and a series that has seen the last 22 meetings that have not gone into overtime play under the total in 21 of them! The last 11 in Cleveland have all stayed under the total, and the most points scored in any of the 11 games has been 181!!! Additionally the Pistons are now 30-8 to the under in their last 38 games vs a team with a winning record. THE UNDER IS MY NBA GAME OF THE YEAR!!!
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Georgia State v. Hofstra UNDER 131.5 | Top | 67-68 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 42 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Furman v. NC Greensboro UNDER 136 | Top | 65-66 | Win | 100 | 10 h 4 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Bradley v. Creighton UNDER 137 | Top | 81-62 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 21 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call.
|
|||||||
03-05-10 | Elon v. Davidson UNDER 136 | Top | 66-59 | Win | 100 | 8 h 48 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. Under gets the call
|
|||||||
03-04-10 | Evansville v. Missouri State UNDER 133 | Top | 46-52 | Win | 100 | 15 h 60 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. This game is staying under the total. Ranked #1
|
|||||||
03-04-10 | Los Angeles Lakers v. Miami Heat OVER 188.5 | Top | 111-114 | Win | 100 | 14 h 38 m | Show |
The Lakers will play to their lowest posted total of the year in this one. It also opens up a highly predictive system, that has turned in a 138-84 ATS mark the last 222 occurances. That is playing over when you have an excellent team (scoring margin of 6+), facing a team off a high scoring game (sor total points or more (Miami 216 last game). Miami is also 13-8 to the over this season after allowing 100 points in their previous game. This one goes over the total.
|
|||||||
03-04-10 | Southern Illinois v. Drake UNDER 134.5 | Top | 61-63 | Win | 100 | 12 h 22 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. This one stays under the total.
|
|||||||
03-03-10 | Connecticut v. Notre Dame UNDER 142 | Top | 50-58 | Win | 100 | 12 h 32 m | Show |
The Irish are looking like they will finish the season without star Luke Harangody. They have done well in the 4 games he has missed so far, but you can see the team is playing harder on the defensive end, as well as not scoring as effectively. Notre Dame has scored less than 70 in 3 of the 4 he has missed, excluding OT points, and at the same timehave not allowed 70. To put that in perspective the Irish failed to reach 70 in just 1 Big East game with Harangody on the court. Huskies 14-5 to the under as a road dog of 6.5 or less last 19, and Irish 16-5 under off an ATS win. I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
03-02-10 | Eastern Kentucky v. Eastern Illinois UNDER 128.5 | Top | 61-68 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 21 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. UNDER gets the call rated #3 play on card
|
|||||||
03-02-10 | Tennessee St. v. Murray State UNDER 138.5 | Top | 51-84 | Win | 100 | 7 h 48 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. Under gets the call ranked #2 of all plays
|
|||||||
03-02-10 | Jacksonville St v. Morehead State UNDER 136.5 | Top | 54-87 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 33 m | Show |
I have been impatiently waiting for the conference championship rounds to begin. I have put tons of hours into research, and have fine tuned systems with every single game played in this round by conference, by pointspread, by total, and more. What I have discovered is utilizing this method, in what I call "cluster wagering", there is a great opportunity to cash a myriad of games over the two week period. All systems are based on 6 years of research, and there are many. Some will no perform, but many will, which is the beauty of cluster wagering. I have been highly successful at doing this in bracketbuster for the last 4 years, and the conference championship rounds the last 2, but have dramatically improved upon this. I will rate the plays from #1 to #last, for clients that just want the cream of the crop, but I suggest to play them all. under gets the call. Play ranked #4 of all plays
|
|||||||
03-01-10 | Fresno State v. Utah State OVER 128 | Top | 39-76 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 28 m | Show |
The Utah St. Aggies are among the hottest teams in the country, and have won 13 straight games. Their last may have been one of their best as they commited just 5 turnovers on the road at Hawaii. That sets up a huge situation playing on the over, as teams that commit 5 turnovers or less, play to a 50-22 mark in their next game to the over, with a total set in the 120s. This will also be a low water mark for the Aggies in terms of playing to their lowest total of the season. The low number is bolstered by the fact that Fresno St. has played 8 straight unders in league play. Utah St. has now played to a 9-1 mark to the over after an ATS loss, and these teams have played 8 of their last 10 games to the over. I'll go with the over in this one.
|
|||||||
03-01-10 | San Antonio Spurs v. New Orleans Hornets UNDER 195 | Top | 106-92 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 32 m | Show |
The San Antonio Spurs are scoring well this season, and average over 100ppg. That all changes when they play on 0 days rest where they have had 9 games this season and average just 91.6ppg. They have played to an 19-6-1 mark to the under off 0 rest in their last 26. New Orleans is tough at home, and facing teams with winning records at home, they have held them to -5.5 points a game less than their season average. The Hornets are also 21-8-1 to the under as a home dog. San Antonio has played 8 straight unders vs teams with a home winning percentage of greater than .600, and the last 5 played here in New Orleans have all stayed under. I'll go with the under in this one.
|
|||||||
03-01-10 | New York Knicks v. Cleveland Cavaliers OVER 210 | Top | 93-124 | Win | 100 | 12 h 29 m | Show |
There are a combination of factors going in this one that points to a high scoring game. The Knicks are a bad team, that plays their best vs top teams, and in the 9 games they have been a 10+ point dog this season, they have averaged 110ppg, and their games have averaged over 220 points. The Knicks are also playing very uptempo right now, and have allowed 110 or more in 9 of their last 10, leading to 9 overs in the 10 games. The Cavs have been playing up as well with 14 of their last 21 going over, and have averaged 108ppg in their last 12. The Cavs went through 18 games at home with no team topping 101, but then the Knicks came in and got 106, and suddenly the Cavs have allowed 104ppg in their last 5 at home. Cavs have been 7-0-1 in their last 8 after scoring 100+ and 9-1-1 when their opponent has allowed 100+ in their last game. I'll go with the over in this one.
|
|||||||
03-01-10 | Georgetown v. West Virginia UNDER 136.5 | Top | 68-81 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 23 m | Show |
The Hoyas have played 5 of their last 6 games vs teams that really like to play fast, and uptempo, and tonight's opponent is not that style of team. The Mountaineers have played 14 games at home this season, and has held every team to below their season average in points, allowing just 60.5ppg. Contrast that to their road mark of 70.5ppg allowed, and this team simply steps it up on the defensive end at home. Hoyas are 35-17 in their last 52 on the road vs a home team, with a winning home record, and none of the last 4 between these clubs played at West Virginia have topped the total. I'll go with the under here.
|
|||||||
03-01-10 | Georgia Southern v. NC Greensboro UNDER 147.5 | Top | 79-81 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 22 m | Show |
Georgia Southern and NC Dreensboro have combined for a 15-43 record this season, in what amounts to a lost season for both teams. The Spartans have topped the 70 point mark in just 1 of their last 22 games, so as a favorite here, it certainly looks like this one is going to have trouble cracking the 140 mark, so I see a lot of value on the under here. Georgia Southern has played 8 straight games over, and that certainly has boosted the number here. The caveat however is their 9-1 mark to the under as a road dog of up to 6.5. They are also 14-4 to the under vs teams with a winning percentage of under .400. Greensboro now 19-7 to the under off an ATS win. I'll go under in this one.
|
|||||||
02-27-10 | Jacksonville State v. Tennessee Tech UNDER 147.5 | Top | 62-72 | Win | 100 | 13 h 34 m | Show |
The Jacksonville ST. Gamecocks have been a poor road team all season with just 1 win, but they have become a poor offensive team when they lost Jay Strowbridge. Strowbridge averaged 12.4ppg. The Gamecocks averaged 73.3ppg with him in the lineup, and juat 67.1ppg without him. Lately the Dolphin offense has been really slumping, as they have averaged just 60.5ppg in their last 4. Tennessee Tech has some skewed numbers, as they have played in 5 overtime games, leading to an additional 156 points scored in their games, inflating averages by 5.5 points per game. It is a team that has scored 72 or less 14 times, and when you consider 5 OT games, the number is actually much higher. Jacksonville St. has gone under in 7 of 8 as a dog of up to 6.5 points, and Tech under at home to a 7-3-1 mark in their last 11. Throw in a nifty 97-38 system signature on the under, and I'm going with the under here.
|
|||||||
02-27-10 | Princeton v. Columbia UNDER 105 | Top | 67-52 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 56 m | Show |
The Princeton Tigers are well known for their Princeton defense, and methodical offense, that runs time off the clock on both ends of the floor. The Columbia Lions are not known for this, but they have become as good at it as Princeton. The Lions have now played 19 of their last 20 games to the under at home in Ivy play. Princeton has now played to a 21-5 mark to the under in their last 26 in Ivy play, and 4 of the last 5 between these clubs have gone under as well. I'll go with the under in this one.
|
|||||||
02-27-10 | Brown v. Dartmouth UNDER 123 | Top | 76-57 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 55 m | Show |
The Dartmoth Big Geen don't even have a double-digit scorer on their entire team, and the last 13 Ivy games they have played have seen 13 of the 14 stay under the total. Outside overtime games, and games with Cornell, the conference kingpin, their Ivy totals at home haven't even sniffed 123. This is just another bad conference, with 2 of their weaker teams facing off, and a long hostory of no scoring here. I'll play this one to stay under the total.
|