Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-08-23 | Fairleigh Dickinson v. Manhattan UNDER 151.5 | 76-71 | Win | 100 | 12 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections place the combined score to fall into the mid 140 range giving us a viable opportunity to cash a under ticket. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (FARLEIGH DICKINSON) - an average team (+/- 3.5 PPG differential) against a terrible team (8 or less PPG differential), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game are 39-12 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 77% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at 145.1 . Play under |
|||||||
12-08-23 | Stonehill v. Rider UNDER 148.5 | 56-73 | Win | 100 | 11 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. STONEHILL is 9-1 UNDER versus poor shooting teams - making 42% or less of their shots over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 126.8 ppg scored,STONEHILL is 16-5 UNDER versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 free or less throws/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 131.6 ppg scored. RIDER is 12-3 UNDER after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 134.2 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (RIDER STONEHILL) - after 4 or more consecutive losses, in a game involving two struggling teams (20% or less ) are 51-19 UNDER L/26 seasons with the combined average of 136.7 ppg scored. Play under |
|||||||
12-08-23 | North Carolina A&T +22 v. High Point | 62-75 | Win | 100 | 11 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N CAROLINA A&T is 13-4 ATS L/17 in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog . CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (HIGH POINT) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a terrible team (20% or ,less) are 19-53 ATS L/26 seasons for a go against 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play on North Carolina A&T to cover |
|||||||
12-07-23 | Eastern Kentucky v. NC-Greensboro OVER 145.5 | 85-87 | Win | 100 | 11 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hamilton is 30-18 OVER when the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of E KENTUCKY.Hamilton is 14-5 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of E KENTUCKY. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UNC-GREENSBORO) - average defensive team (67-74 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG), after a blowout win by 30 points or more are 44-17 OVER L/26 seasons for a 77% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 153 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
12-07-23 | Pacers v. Bucks UNDER 256 | 128-119 | Win | 100 | 9 h 44 m | Show | |
No way do I see Milwaukee allowing the Pacers to run and gun here in comfortable fashion, and instead I expect the Bucks to become very physical in their attempt to slow down this free wheeling group.Yes, I know the numbers attached to this tilt, favor a very high scoring affair, but in my humble opinion the lines-makers have over adjusted towards a public enticing Total. This Im betting contributes to a combined score that fails to eclipse this total. MILWAUKEE is 29-16 UNDER in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (MILWAUKEE) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. are 33-11 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 77% conversion rate for bettors. NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (INDIANA) - after scoring 115 points or more 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 125 points or more 2 straight games are 44-19 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play under |
|||||||
12-06-23 | SMU v. Arizona State -3 | 74-76 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona State (5-2) is looking to extend a three-game winning streak when they face SMU (6-3). It is the sixth time the Sun Devils and Mustangs have matched up, with ASU winning each of the previous five meetings. Im betting nothing in this series changes tonight as the Sun Devils continue their strong play at home. Arizona State has outscored opponents 232-189 (+43) during the streak, with all three victories coming by double-digits. Coach Hurley has led the Maroon & Gold to nine-straight wins against non-conference opponents at Desert Financial Arena. Rinse and repeat in play. ARIZONA ST is 9-2 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 2 seasons. SMU is 0-7 ATS after a blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons. Hurley is 9-0 ATS after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 37% or less as the coach of ARIZONA ST. CBB underdog (SMU) - average 3PT shooting team (32-36.5%) against a good 3PT defense (32% or less), average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 reb/game) are 26-60 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Arizona State to cover |
|||||||
12-06-23 | Rice v. Houston OVER 139.5 | 39-75 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a score of between 142 to 147 combined points giving us great value with an over wager. RICE is 7-0 OVER vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 169 ppg scored.Pera is 10-2 OVER in a road game where the total is 135 to 139.5 as the coach of RICE with a combined average of 147.5 ppg scored. CBB Home teams against the total (HOUSTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (60 or more shots/game), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 33-8 OVER L/26 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 156.3 ppg. CBB Home teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (HOUSTON) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 50-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score coming in at 142.9 ppg. _Play over |
|||||||
12-06-23 | 76ers v. Wizards +10.5 | 131-126 | Win | 100 | 11 h 8 m | Show | |
After two hard fought games and losses vs New Orleans and Boston the Sixers are on tired legs and in a bit of a letdown situation, which bodes well for us covering this offering with the home dog Washington Wizards. Also the 76ers after. fast start to their campaign have failed to win 6 of their L/10 and are being a little over rated here in this situation. Note: Washington has covered 4 of their L/6 and get my support getting points in this spot play. NBA Home underdogs of 10 or more points (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points, off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog are 44-18 ATS L/27 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. NBA road teams (PHILADELPHIA) - a very good team (7 or more PPG differential) against a terrible team (7 or less PPG differential), after a combined score of 235 points or more are 5-25 L/27 seasons for a go against 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Washington to cover |
|||||||
12-06-23 | Magic +4.5 v. Cavs | 111-121 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 1 m | Show | |
The Magic had a 9 game win streak snapped last time out and now Im betting on a bounce back effort vs the Cleveland Cavs here tonight. Quote:"The last couple of games, we've been slipping," Magic forward Franz Wagner said, per the Orlando Sentinel. "That's how we set the tone during the game, that's how we get out and run, and get easy points in the transition. "We got to make sure we get back to that." End Quote: I concerted effort from this very well conditioned and focused Magic side is the bet Im recommending. ORLANDO is 31-15 ATS as an underdog of 3.5 to 9.5 points over the last 2 seasons. NBA Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (CLEVELAND) - off a win against a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season are 10-35 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Orlando to cover |
|||||||
12-06-23 | Penn State +7.5 v. Maryland | 75-81 | Win | 100 | 11 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After Maryland was outhustled and outplayed by the Hoosiers last time out Im betting despite of wanting to bounce back just do not matchup well enough to cover this number. With 10 new players, including nine transfers, the Rhoades-led Nittany Lions are not a Big 10 team that is getting much respect . They started hot with four straight wins, but have since dropped the same number of games , but are still competitive and must be respected here getting points. Penn State to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Suns v. Lakers -1 | 103-106 | Win | 100 | 15 h 30 m | Show | |
Lakers future HOFer James helped the Lakers to a 4-0 record in group-stage play of the inaugural event and the top seed in the West heading into the win-and-advance quarterfinals and Im betting he will be the difference maker here tonight her vs a Suns side that the Lakers have dominated of late winning 4 straight meetings. The Lakers opened their in-season tournament group-stage schedule with a 122-119 victory at Phoenix on Nov. 10. Los Angeles and according to my projections a rinse and repeart situation is once again in play. Note: PHOENIX is 1-9 ATS revenging a close loss vs opponent of 3 points or less over the last 2 seasons. PHOENIX is also just 1-9 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 46% or better of their shots this season. Play on the LA Lakers to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Seton Hall +11.5 v. Baylor | 60-78 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Seton Hall has some injuries but are still more than capable of being competitive here this evening at Baylor. SETON HALL is 16-6 ATS in road games over the last 3 seasons. SETON HALL is 13-4 ATS in road games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.. Holloway is 32-17 ATS L/49 as a road underdog or pick in all games he has coached SETON HALL is 9-2 ATS versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game over the last 2 seasons. CBB Favorites of 10 to 19.5 points (BAYLOR) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, top level team, winning 80% or more of their games on the season are 41-81 ATS L/5 seasons for go against 67% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Weber State v. Utah Valley +3 | 54-70 | Win | 100 | 15 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UTAH VALLEY ST is 13-1 ATS versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. UTAH VALLEY ST is 9-1 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.UTAH VALLEY ST is 8-1 ATS versus teams who average 6 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.UTAH VALLEY ST is 9-1 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. UTAH VALLEY ST is 20-3 ATS after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. WEBER ST is 1-10 ATS after 5 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. UTAH VALLEY ST is 5-1 straight up against WEBER ST since 1997. Play on Utah State Valley to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Knicks v. Bucks -4.5 | 122-146 | Win | 100 | 13 h 11 m | Show | |
Winners in nine of their past 11 tilts, the Bucks will host the Knicks in an NBA in-season tournament quarterfinal battle on Tuesday. Milwaukee has won their L/8 home games and are 7-1 L/8 overall vs the Knicks and get the nod again here this Tuesday night. MILWAUKEE is 18-7 ATS as a home favorite of 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. NBA Underdogs (NEW YORK) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team are 19-46 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 71% conversion rate for bettors. NBA Road underdogs (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (36.5% or better ), after 2 straight games making 16 or more 3 point shots are 19-43 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play on the Milwaukee Bucks to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Louisiana Tech v. Stephen F Austin -3.5 | 56-49 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 15 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SF AUSTIN ST is 6-0 ATS as a home favorite of 6 points or less or pick over the last 2 seasons. SF AUSTIN ST is 9-1 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points Play on Stephen F Austin to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Villanova v. Kansas State +2.5 | 71-72 | Win | 100 | 14 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. KANSAS ST is 10-1 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 2 seasons. CBB underdog (KANSAS ST) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in a non-conference game between two teams from major division 1-A conferences are 36-10 ATS L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Kansas State to cover |
|||||||
12-05-23 | Florida Atlantic v. Illinois UNDER 147.5 | 89-98 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two top tier teams go head to head here in what Im betting will be a physical affair thats see both sides pay special attention to defensive responsibilities in transition.. FLA ATLANTIC is 9-1 UNDER L/10 in a neutral court game where the total is 145 to 149.5 with a combined average of 137.2 ppg scored. ILLINOIS is 20-8 UNDER L/28 after 4 straight wins by 10 points or more with a combined average of 134.7 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (ILLINOIS) - off an upset win by 15 points or more as an underdog, on Tuesday nights are 32-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 84% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of 130.7 ppg scored. Play on UNDER |
|||||||
12-04-23 | Cal Poly +14 v. Oregon State | 63-70 | Win | 100 | 12 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. OREGON ST is 0-6 ATS when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. OREGON ST is 3-12 ATS as a home favorite or pick over the last 3 seasons. CAL POLY-SLO is 18-4 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. |
|||||||
12-04-23 | Arkansas State +25 v. Alabama | 65-89 | Win | 100 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
Alabama is off a loss to Clemson last time out and finally looked like they had run out of gas after fast action run and gun affairs. Now in a bit of physical and emotional letdown situation Im betting on them paying more attention to strong defensive ball , which in turn will help is get a strong opportunity for a tilt that that sees the under rated dog stay closer than expected. ALABAMA is 0-9 ATS after allowing 80 points or more 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.ALABAMA is 1-12 ATS after 2 straight games where both teams score 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. Oats is 0-11 ATS after allowing 75 points or more 3 straight games as the coach of ALABAMA. ARKANSAS ST is 13-4 ATS L/17 versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 84+ points/game. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (ARKANSAS ST) - after going under the total by more than 6 points in five consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 24-4 ATS L/26 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Arkansas State to cover |
|||||||
12-04-23 | Celtics -4.5 v. Pacers | 112-122 | Loss | -115 | 11 h 4 m | Show | |
Boston destroyed Indiana by a 155-014 count when they met back in November as their side open style of play back fired on them against a team with a far superior D, and and even more lethal balanced offense. The Pacers despite of looking for revenge, Im betting dont have what it takes to beat the Celtics and more importantly even cover the number. Mazzulla is 23-7 ATS versus terrible defensive teams - allowing a shooting pct defense of 48% or more as the coach of BOSTON with a average ppg diff of +10.3 ppg. Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points, off a road win by 10 points or more are 3-39 L/5 seasons for a 93% conversion rate with the average ppf per game diff clicking in at -11.5 which easily qualifies in this ATS offering. Play on Boston to cover |
|||||||
12-04-23 | Maryland-Eastern Shore +16.5 v. East Carolina | 52-63 | Win | 100 | 7 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MD-EAST SHORE is 11-2 ATS after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.MD-EAST SHORE is 12-1 ATS after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 season.MD-EAST SHORE is 12-1 ATS after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 season. Crafton is 9-2 ATS in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MD-EAST SHORE. Play on Maryland Eastern Shore to cover |
|||||||
12-03-23 | Creighton v. Nebraska OVER 149.5 | 89-60 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Both these teams can really shoot it. The Bluejays are a potent offensive club, averaging 83.3 points per game while shooting 50 percent from the field and 40 percent from 3-point range. Meanwhile, the Huskers are 13-3 over the last 16 games dating back to Feb. 1, 2023. A big reason for that is NU's offense, as NU has averaged 77.6 ppg on 48 percent shooting in that stretch.Nebraska is currently averaging 81.6 points per game, which is fourth in the Big Ten as of Dec. 1. The last time NU averaged more points per game in its first seven games was in 1995-96 (89.7 ppg).Hoiberg is 10-1 OVER after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEBRASKA.Hoiberg is 14-4 OVER in a home game where the total is 145 to 149.5 as the coach of NEBRASKA.NEBRASKA is 7-0 OVER after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. Play over |
|||||||
12-03-23 | Fairfield v. Rider UNDER 142.5 | 88-81 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Play under |
|||||||
12-03-23 | Auburn v. Appalachian State UNDER 142.5 | 64-69 | Win | 100 | 5 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Play under |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Thunder v. Mavs UNDER 235.5 | 126-120 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 41 m | Show | |
Dallas looked exhausted last night in a 108-94 loss to Memphis and now in back to back games will be even more tired and less likely to be in the shape to run and gun with this sometimes explosive visiting Oklahoma City side. Recently the Mavs have been paying better attention to D, and as a result have not been as proficient offensively, but it was a problem they needed address. Because of thier better defensive efforts they have seen 4 of their L/5 fail to eclipse the total. Here tonight on tired legs and going against a Thunder side that can light the scoreboard up in a hurry another more disciplined D plan should be in place, which Im betting results in a lower scoring affair than the linesmakers expect. OKLAHOMA CITY is 12-3 UNDER in road games versus sub par defensive teams - allowing 116+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 229.4 ppg scored. DALLAS is 41-26 UNDER after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 223.2 ppg scored. NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (DALLAS/OKLAHOMA CITY ) - well rested team - playing 4 or less games in 10 days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 41-5 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 218.2 ppg scored. Play under |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Cal-Irvine +6 v. Utah State | 69-79 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Sprinkle is 1-10 ATS after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 31 or less rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. Turner in his teams last 33 games as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points as the coach of UC-IRVINE has seen average ppg diff of -1.4 ppg.UC-IRVINE is 9-1 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. Play on UC Irvine to cover |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Pacers +3.5 v. Heat | 144-129 | Win | 100 | 11 h 20 m | Show | |
Miami took the first game of this back to back series by a 142-132 count, but Im betting they wont come out of this one so easily vs this run and gun Pacers side. That was a big output for the Heat and now regression is expected. However, the Pacers offense never seems to slow down as they are the highest scoring team in the NBA. Advantage Pacers.
NBA Road underdogs (INDIANA) - after a combined score of 235 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 265 points or more are 24-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. NBA Home favorites (MIAMI) - after a combined score of 255 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 235 points or more are 19-54 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 74% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Indiana to cover |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Magic +2.5 v. Nets | 101-129 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 31 m | Show | |
Orlando is on a roll having won 10 straight games, and have the young legs and ambition not to let up here in Brooklyn tonight. Yes, the Magic played last night in a 130-125 win last night but they are one of the NBAs best conditioned teams and deserve respect here as underdogs. Note: ORLANDO is 13-2 ATS after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. ORLANDO is 13-4 ATS in all games this season.ORLANDO is 10-1 ATS after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. BROOKLYN is 23-44 ATS as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. NBA Home teams (BROOKLYN) - bad pressure defensive team - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game, in December games are 3-24 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 89% conversion rate for bettors. NBA Road teams vs. the money line (ORLANDO) - revenging a road loss vs opponent against opponent off a close home loss by 3 points or less are 22-10 L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate. Play on Orlando to cover |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Washington v. Colorado State UNDER 156 | 81-86 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . COLORADO ST is 11-3 UNDER in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 128.8 ppg.COLORADO ST is 9-2 UNDER in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots over the last 2 seasons.COLORADO ST is 20-9 UNDER in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.COLORADO ST is 7-0 UNDER in road games after scoring 85 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 130 ppg scored. Hopkins is 21-11 UNDER in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON with a combined average of 139.1 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (COLORADO ST) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a winning record.are 167-103 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 62% conversion rate for bettors. |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Detroit +11.5 v. Cleveland State | 58-69 | Win | 100 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Detroit to cover |
|||||||
12-02-23 | Marquette v. Wisconsin +3.5 | 64-75 | Win | 100 | 3 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two experienced sides, in a game my projections estimate will be a close back and forth affair. Wisconsin has not faced the same competition as Marquette, but playing at home here gives them an edge on this line. Last year Wisconsin won by a 80-77 count and here as hosts I wont be surprised if there is a similar outcome. WISCONSIN is 11-3 ATS vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 season WISCONSIN is 12-3 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) over the last 3 seasons. Play on Wisconsin to cover Play on Wisconsin to cover |
|||||||
12-01-23 | Nuggets -2 v. Suns | 119-111 | Win | 100 | 13 h 37 m | Show | |
The Nuggets are expected to be almost fully healthy tonight as Jokic , and Murray are expected to play . The Nuggets have dominated their opposition when healthy and are 7-1 when Murray plays. I know the suns have played well, but are just 1-8 ATS versus good shooting teams like Denver - making 46% or more of their shots this season. The Suns couldn't stop the Nuggets in last years play offs and Im betting nothing changes today. Play on Nuggets to cover |
|||||||
12-01-23 | Connecticut v. Kansas -2.5 | 65-69 | Win | 100 | 12 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This will be a back and forth event , but home court advantage is in play here. Kansas enters Friday’s matchup averaging 81.3 points per game with a plus-16.6 scoring margin. Kansas and UConn are meeting for the fourth time in a battle of two big brand programs. Kansas has won all three previous meetings with the most recent matchup coming in the second round of the 2016 NCAA Tournament, a KU 73-61 win in Des Moines, Iowa. Im betting History will repeat itself. Hurley is 4-13 ATS as a road underdog of 3 points or less or pick in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Kansas to cover |
|||||||
12-01-23 | Purdue v. Northwestern +5.5 | 88-92 | Win | 100 | 11 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Purdue didn't lose very often last season, but all five of its regular season losses came inside Big Ten action so their not immune to a down performance. Purdue went up to Northwestern as the #1 team in the country and Northwestern pulled off the 64-58 upset. While revenge will be a motivating factor their also the issue of Northwestern knowing what it takes to beat Purdue.
Zach Edey is still at Purdue. Im betting they battle to the end again and getting the points remain golden. NORTHWESTERN is 11-2 ATS versus excellent teams - shooting 45% or more with a defense of 42% or less over the last 2 seasons. PURDUE is 1-10 ATS in December games over the last 3 seasons.PURDUE is 3-11 ATS as a road favorite or pick over the last 3 seasons. Painter is 1-8 ATS in road games after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more as the coach of PURDUE. Play on Northwestern to cover |
|||||||
12-01-23 | 76ers v. Celtics OVER 224 | 119-125 | Win | 100 | 11 h 41 m | Show | |
Both of these teams rank in the top five in offensive rating and should easily both top the 109-114 point plateau according to my projections. BOSTON is 12-1 OVER in home games when they allow 109 to 114 points in a game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 232.7 ppg scored.PHILADELPHIA is 33-20 OVER after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average with a combined average of 228.1 ppg. Play over |
|||||||
12-01-23 | Wizards +11.5 v. Magic | 125-130 | Win | 100 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
Orlando took out Washington by a 139 -120 count in the first of these back to back games in this series, but I saw enough in the first game to believe that the Wizards can be more competitive in rebound mode. NBA team (WASHINGTON) - after a blowout loss by 15 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 115 points or more are 55-18 L/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors. Play on the Wizards to cover |
|||||||
11-30-23 | Creighton v. Oklahoma State +8 | 79-65 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. We are getting value with the underdog here based on the fact that OSU has played the last three-and-half games without their most consistent offesnive threat – senior guard Bryce Thompson (14.3 ppg, 6/12 3pt) – but other weapons have emerged in his absence and they must not be disregarded as viable underdogs here at home.OSU has scored 90+ points in back-to-back games for the first time under Boynton and have the capabilities to had here as pups. OKLAHOMA ST is 31-8 ATS L/39 in home games after 4 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers. McDermott is 27-46 ATS in road games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game as the coach of CREIGHTON. Play on Oklahoma state to cover |
|||||||
11-30-23 | Fairleigh Dickinson +11.5 v. Fordham | 52-80 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB team (FARLEIGH DICKINSON) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or better ) against a poor 3PT shooting team (32% or less), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 47% or higher are 12-41 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Fairleigh Dickinson to cover |
|||||||
11-30-23 | Liberty +8 v. Florida Atlantic | 58-83 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FAU is a top ranked team, but this balanced Liberty side is being highly underestimated in their abilities to hang here, vs FAU as Kenpom ranks them 39th in the country.Unbeaten Liberty received seven votes in this week's AP Poll, the second straight week the Flames have received seven votes. Im betting Liberty's slow tempe will pull FAU out of their flow and make this a grinding game that favors the visitors. LIBERTY is 21-8 ATS L/29 after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games . CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (LIBERTY) - in a game involving two good defensive teams (40-42.5%), dominant rebounding team (+6 or more reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) are 38-14 ATS L/5 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Liberty to cover |
|||||||
11-29-23 | Virginia Tech +10 v. Auburn | 57-74 | Loss | -105 | 16 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Hokies only hit 20-60 (33.3%) against No. 19 Florida Atlantic last time out and were just 2-17 (11.8%) from long range. • In Mike Young’s 131 games as Tech’s head coach, the Hokies have shot 35% or worse just nine times. Im expecting a big bounce back here tonight, along with top tier charity stripe conversion to be the diff maker in us covering this number. Pearl is 2-13 ATS after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games as the coach of AUBURN. Pearl is 12-25 ATS after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. CBB underdog (VIRGINIA TECH) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in a non-conference game between two teams from major division 1-A conferences are 35-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. VTech to cover |
|||||||
11-29-23 | 76ers -2 v. Pelicans | 114-124 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 10 m | Show | |
Philadelphia was hitting on all cylinders in their last game vs the Lakers, and Im betting with that momentum on their sides will continue to push forward here tonight vs a streaky Pelicans side that has lost 2 straight SU/ATS. Philadelphia ranks 2nd in the NBA in SRS with 10.18 mark while, ranks 18th with a 0.45. Considering this the linesmakers in my humble opinion are over estimating the 76ers regression probabilities off a huge game . PHILADELPHIA is 26-12 ATS when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons. PHILADELPHIA is 17-6 ATS on the road when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons. PHILADELPHIA is 16-4 ATS as a road favorite of 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. NBA Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (PHILADELPHIA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% of their games on the season are 23-3 ATS L/5 seasons for a 88% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Philadelphia to cover |
|||||||
11-29-23 | Boston University v. Albany OVER 141 | 72-86 | Win | 100 | 14 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ALBANY) - after beating the spread by more than 30 points in their previous game, on Wednesday games are 26-5 OVER L/26 seasons for. a 84% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 152.2 ppg. Play over |
|||||||
11-29-23 | Gardner-Webb v. Queens NC +2 | 80-83 | Win | 100 | 13 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Queens NC to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Warriors v. Kings UNDER 238.5 | 123-124 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 53 m | Show | |
This is an important tournament game between division rivals , and Im betting it will be a hard fought physical affair that keeps this combined score to the low side of the offered total. SACRAMENTO is 25-14 UNDER when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 232.7 ppg scored. GOLDEN STATE L/33 vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons has seen a combined average of 229.8 ppg scored. NBA Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (SACRAMENTO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% of their games on the season are 41-9 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 222.5 ppg scored. NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (GOLDEN STATE) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days are 63-30 L/27 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 229.9 ppg. Play under |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Rockets v. Mavs -4.5 | 115-121 | Win | 100 | 13 h 15 m | Show | |
Houston has struggled with explosive offensive sides like Dallas recently especially on the road where they are here tonight. Advantage Dallas.HOUSTON is 1-12 ATS ) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 116+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. I know Houston has been an ATM machine for their backs of late, but now the market has adjusted and laying under 5 at home with the Mavericks according to my projections is viable investment option. NBA Road underdogs vs. the money line (HOUSTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, on Tuesday nights are 4-38 L/5 seasons for a 90% go against conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at -12.2 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. NBA Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (HOUSTON) - after beating the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game are 6-27 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. NBA team (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record are 47-22 ATS L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Dallas to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Thunder v. Wolves -3.5 | 103-106 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 33 m | Show | |
The Wolves rank 3rd in the NBA in SRS with 7.70 mark while the Thunder are ranked 4th with a 7.69 mark. When taking into consideration the home court edge where the Wolves are almost always in top form we have a line as mentioned above that should be closer to 5, thus giving us value laying lumber here with the home fav. SRS - Simple Rating System; a rating that takes into account average point differential and strength of schedule. The rating is denominated in points above/below average, where zero is average. MINNESOTA is 10-0 ATS in home games after a blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons.MINNESOTA is 7-0 ATS versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 24 or less free throws/game this season. NBA Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (OKLAHOMA CITY) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, on Tuesday nights are 3-31 L/5 seasons for. a go against 91% conversion rate for bettors with the average ppg diff registering at +11 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Minnesota to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | McNeese State v. UAB -6 | 81-60 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UAB is 17-6 ATS L/23 in home games versus very good shooting teams - making 48% or more of their shots UAB to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Hawks +5 v. Cavs | 105-128 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 28 m | Show | |
Atlanta can run and gun with anyone in the NBA and despite of tnheir defensive failures recently are side that must be respected getting points especially the way their star Trae Young is shooting the ball.Young's most recent top teir offensive effort came on Sunday in a 113-103 loss to the Celtics, when he connected on a team-high 33 points and added seven assists in the second game of a back-to-back.Meanwhile, the market was slow to catchup with Cleveland as this season began , but now they have caught up and are starting to over adjust giving us value with this underdog selection. Advantage Atlanta. NBA Favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (CLEVELAND) - off a close home win by 3 points or less, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season are 5-23 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. .Atlanta has won five of seven games over Cleveland, dating to the beginning of the 2021-22 season. Play on the Atlanta Hawks to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Miami-FL v. Kentucky -6.5 | 73-95 | Win | 100 | 7 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two weeks ago, Kentucky lost to top-ranked Kansas in a tight game in the Champions Classic. Now, the Cats take on their second Top 10 foe of the season when eighth-ranked Miami visits Rupp Arena on Tuesday night in the SEC/ACC Challenge and this time they are now better prepared and organized. Kentucky has now scored at least 81 points in each of its first six games and will have no problems dealing with Florida States balanced attack. Kentucky to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Mississippi State v. Georgia Tech +8.5 | 59-67 | Win | 100 | 11 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MISSISSIPPI ST is 1-8 ATS after 5 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. Stoudamire is 10-2 ATS in home games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 80%) in all games he has coached since 1997 CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (GEORGIA TECH) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in a non-conference game between two teams from major division 1-A conferences are 22-4 ATS L/5 seasons for a 85% conversion rate for bettors. Georgia Tech to cover |
|||||||
11-28-23 | Western Carolina v. Tennessee Tech +5.5 | 69-65 | Win | 100 | 11 h 7 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (W CAROLINA) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, marginal winning team from last season who won between 51% and 60% of their games are 8-31 ATS L/26 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. Tennessee Tech to cover |
|||||||
11-27-23 | Nuggets +5.5 v. Clippers | 113-104 | Win | 100 | 12 h 25 m | Show | |
Denver is 11-6 on the season but just 3-6 on the road, but Im betting those numbers will turn around to upside in Nuggets away games, as they are just to talented to not get into a groove even away from the Mile High City. DENVER is 8-1 straight up against LA CLIPPERS over the last 3 seasons and according to my power rankings have an edge here taking points. I know the Nuggets played last night, but they are a well conditioned side, that will be ready to play here tonight in LA even without Jamal Murray in the lineup. The Clippers rank 9th (3.62) in /SRS while the Cliipers ranks 13th with a 1.31 mark. SRS - Simple Rating System; a rating that takes into account average point differential and strength of schedule. The rating is denominated in points above/below average, where zero is average. NBA team vs the money line (DENVER) - after a cover as a double digit favorite, in November games are 40-6 L/5 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Denver to cover |
|||||||
11-27-23 | Pelicans v. Jazz UNDER 231 | 112-114 | Win | 100 | 11 h 14 m | Show | |
New Orleans enters this game having gone under in their L/4 trips to the hardwood while Utah has gone under 3 straight times. I know New Orleans has been explicit about picking up their defensive play and you can see it in their play, and here tonight in the high altitudes of Salt Lake City Im betting on an even more stringent defensive effort , as their 5th game in a week. Advantage under. NEW ORLEANS is 11-2 UNDER versus struggling teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 219.3 ppg scored. NEW ORLEANS is 17-6 UNDER versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 48% or more over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 225.4 ppg scored. NBA Road teams where the total is 220 to 229.5 (NEW ORLEANS) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a losing team are 33-5 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average score of 215.9 ppg scored. NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 220 (UTAH) - good offensive team - scoring 114+ points/game on the season, after trailing their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half are 48-21 UNDER L/5 seasons with a combined average score of 227 ppg going on the score board. Play under |
|||||||
11-27-23 | UC-Santa Barbara +2 v. Fresno State | 69-65 | Win | 100 | 12 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UC-SANTA BARBARA is 9-2 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots over the last 2 seasons. FRESNO ST is 1-8 ATS in November games over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (UC-SANTA BARBARA) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or more ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5% or better ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 34-5 ATS L/26 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (UC-SANTA BARBARA) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or better ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5%) or better , after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 33-6 L/26 seasons for a 85% conversion rate for bettors. UC-SANTA BARBARA is 5-0 against the spread versus FRESNO ST since 1997. Play in US Santa Barbara to cover |
|||||||
11-27-23 | Houston Christian v. TCU UNDER 164 | 64-101 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. TCU can light up the board and name their score here but Houston Christian on flipside wont be able to penetrate a very TCU D, this Im betting will lead to combined score that does not eclipse this offered total. TCU is 11-3 UNDER after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 135.9 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (TCU) - an explosive offensive team (78 PPG or more ) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more 4 straight games are 39-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average score clicking in at 156.9 ppg scored. Play on the UNDER |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Bulls +4 v. Nets | 109-118 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 12 m | Show | |
Brooklyn is on tired legs as they play their 2nd back to back games this season and are vulnerable .The Nets earned a 109-107 win in Chicago during an in-season tournament game on Nov. 3 and Im betting on another close game here with the points to be golden. BROOKLYN is 11-24 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.BROOKLYN is 4-15 ATS in home games when playing 4 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.BROOKLYN is 21-37 ATS as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points over the last 3 seasons.Vaughn is 11-25 ATSin home games versus struggling teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1996. Play on Chicago to cover |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Suns v. Knicks -3 | 116-113 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 11 m | Show | |
Knicks have looked a little lethargic offensively in back to back games . The first tgame came at the end of a exhausting 5 game road trip and the 2nd was when they played their first game at home after that for-mentioned away rodeo. Now acclimated to home cooking and well rested Im betting on the Knicks will be primed and motivated to play at an optimal level, against a Phoenix Suns squad on a 5 game win streak. NEW YORK is 8-0 ATS after scoring 105 points or less 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The Suns beat Memphis last time out by DDs, but this is not a favorable spot from a historical standpoint for the Suns as Vogel is 12-26 ATS (- in road games off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached. Key injury updates: Beals still out for Suns and Durant(foot) is questionable tonight and if he plays is less than 100%. PHOENIX is 26-44 ATS L/70 in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - out-rebounding opponents by 5+ per game . NBA Favorites on the opening line of 3.5 to 9.5 points (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team are 35-11 L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. NBA Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games against opponent hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games are 36-2 L/5 seasons for a 95% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at +11.3 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on NY Knicks to cover |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Mississippi Valley State +21 v. Pacific | 65-68 | Win | 100 | 9 h 43 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Pacific played a hard fought game and get the win last time out by. a 73-71 count vs lower tier LeMoyne and could easily find themselves flat here. PACIFIC is 3-11 ATS off a home win over the last 3 seasons.PACIFIC is 3-11 ATS off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
MISS VALLEY ST is 19-8 ATS versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (PACIFIC) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 65 points or less 3 straight games are just 10-33 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 77% conversion rate for bettors. CBB Favorites of 20 or more points (PACIFIC) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after 2 straight losses by 15 points or more are 11-35 ATS L/26 seasons for a go against 76% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Miss St Valley to cover |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Bellarmine v. West Virginia -9.5 | 58-62 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. West Virginia to cover |
|||||||
11-26-23 | George Washington v. Delaware UNDER 151.5 | 81-71 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Canisius v. Bowling Green UNDER 145.5 | 73-77 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-26-23 | North Carolina Central v. Coastal Carolina UNDER 144.5 | 70-58 | Win | 100 | 6 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Stonehill v. Quinnipiac -12.5 | 69-80 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Quinnipiac to cover |
|||||||
11-26-23 | Brown v. Ohio UNDER 147 | 77-82 | Loss | -110 | 1 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
11-25-23 | Mavs -2 v. Clippers | 88-107 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 21 m | Show | |
Dallas 10-5 is the fresher team here entering this tilt against a LA Clippers (6-8) side that played last night. The Mavs rank 15th with. a+0.83 rating in the NBA in SRS while the Clippers, are ranked 21st with a -0.01 rating. Factoring in exhaustion adn performance levels the Play on Dallas cover |
|||||||
11-25-23 | Furman v. UAB -5 | 86-92 | Win | 100 | 9 h 0 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FURMAN is 1-9 ATS in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. CFB Road teams as an underdog or pick (FURMAN) - after allowing 75 points or more 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less are 7-31 L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on UAB to cover |
|||||||
11-25-23 | Alabama v. Oregon UNDER 160.5 | 99-91 | Loss | -109 | 5 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-25-23 | Canisius v. Western Kentucky UNDER 146.5 | 85-77 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Spurs v. Warriors -10.5 | 112-118 | Loss | -107 | 14 h 54 m | Show | |
The Golden State Warriors have struggled out of the gate this season and now have an opportunity to take on their frustrations out on a San Antonio team on a 10 game losing run and that they have beaten up pretty easily in recent meetings with 37,31, 15 points deficit victories in their L/3 meetings. I know Golden State has not covered any of their 7 home games this season, but all good and bad runs must come to an end, and thats what Im betting on here with the DD fav. Note:GOLDEN STATE is 8-0 ATS in home games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons which was the case last time out in Phoenix. GOLDEN STATE is 21-7 ATS in home games off a road loss over the last 3 seasons. SAN ANTONIO is 8-25 ATS in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 230 over the last 2 seasons.SAN ANTONIO is 16-31 ATS as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. SAN ANTONIO is 12-28 ATS when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. Favorites (GOLDEN STATE) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Friday nights are 33-9 ATS L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Golden State to cover |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Santa Clara v. Oregon UNDER 146.5 | 88-82 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 12 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Heat v. Knicks -5.5 | 98-100 | Loss | -107 | 12 h 4 m | Show | |
Miami has played some decent defensive ball of late , while winning at Cleveland and Chicago. But from a historical standpoint this has not been a good omen for their betting backers as they are 2-11 ATS after allowing 105 points or less 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. Meanwhile, NYK after a extensive 5 game road trip looked flat in tired in their final game of the trip with a 117-110 loss to Minnesota. However, they have now been off since Nov 20th and with extensive rest and back on home court Im betting on a big effort from the Knicks. . NEW YORK is 10-1 ATS after scoring 100 points or less over the last 2 seasons. Note: Underdogs vs the money line (MIAMI) - off a road win by 10 points or more against opponent off a road loss by 10 points or more are 6-34 L/5 seasons for a go against 85% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at +8.2 which qualifies on this ATS offering. Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games against opponent hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games are 35-2 L/5 seasons for a 95% conversion rate with the average ppg diff registering at +11.5 which qualities on this ATS offering. MIAMI is 18-32 ATS after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.( Heat beat Cleveland 129-96 last time out) NBA Road underdogs (MIAMI) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (36.5% or better ), after 2 straight games making 16 or more 3 point shots are 18-43 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 70% conversion rte for bettors. Play on NY Knicks to cover |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Seton Hall v. Iowa UNDER 155 | 72-85 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 20 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Baylor v. Florida UNDER 158 | 95-91 | Loss | -111 | 2 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Toledo v. Indiana State UNDER 165.5 | 74-76 | Win | 100 | 6 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-24-23 | Monmouth v. Belmont UNDER 155.5 | 93-84 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-23-23 | Michigan State v. Arizona UNDER 146.5 | 68-74 | Win | 100 | 9 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a score in the high 130s to low 140s, giving us an significant possession edge to the under. Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ARIZONA) - after scoring 85 points or more, with just one or fewer starters returning from last year in the first 10 games of the season are 40-12 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 137.7 ppg. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points ( MICH ST) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are 148-71 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors with thre average ppg diff clicking in at 141.1 ppg. Play under |
|||||||
11-23-23 | Colorado State v. Creighton UNDER 154 | 69-48 | Win | 100 | 6 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-23-23 | Florida Atlantic v. Butler +7 | 91-86 | Win | 100 | 7 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. BUTLER is 27-12 ATS L/49 in a neutral court game where the total is 130 to 139.5 with the average ppg diff clicking at 0.00 (even). CBB Neutral court teams (FLA ATLANTIC) - good shooting team from last season - made 45% of their shot attempts, with 3+ more starters returning from last year than opponent, in the first ten games of the season are 11-32 L5 seasons for a go against 75% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Butler to cover |
|||||||
11-23-23 | Villanova v. North Carolina UNDER 146.5 | 83-81 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-23-23 | Penn State +8 v. Texas A&M | 77-89 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. PENN ST is 34-17 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.PENN ST is 9-1 ATS as a neutral court underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons.PENN ST is 8-0 ATS in all tournament games over the last 2 seasons. Play on Penn State to cover |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Mavs -2.5 v. Lakers | 104-101 | Win | 100 | 12 h 19 m | Show | |
The Mavericks are scoring 122.8 points a game, which is second-most in the league, in wide open run and gun fashion, and that makes them viable options against a Lakers side that is due for offensive regression after last nights 131 output vs the Jazz. NBA teams where the line is +3 to -3 (DALLAS) - after a home game where both teams score 100 or more points, playing with 2 days rest are 95-84 L/5 ATS for a 65% conversion rate for bettors. NBA team vs the money line (DALLAS) - an explosive offensive team (118 or more PPG) against an avg. offensive team (108-114 PPG), after allowing 68 points or more in the first half last game are 25-6 L/27 seasons for a 81% conversion rate with a average ppf diff clicking in at +8.2 which qualifies on this ATS offering. DALLAS is 3-0 straight up against LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons. Play on Dallas to cover |
|||||||
11-22-23 | New Mexico v. Rice UNDER 166.5 | 90-56 | Win | 100 | 7 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Florida v. Pittsburgh UNDER 157 | 86-71 | Push | 0 | 7 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | 76ers v. Wolves -5 | 99-112 | Win | 100 | 15 h 53 m | Show | |
The Timberwolves have won 10 of their first 13 games to jump to the top of the Western Conference standings and according to my power rankings matchup well here vs the Philadelphia 76ers here tonight with home court advantage on their sides. The Wolves rank 1st in the NBA in defensive efficiency which is important in game that features the 76ers top ranked offensive efficiency. Minnesota is coming off back-to-back wins against the New Orleans Pelicans and New York Knicks, and it has won nine of its last 10 trips to the hardwood and have momentum on their sides, vs a Philadelphia side on a short rest after taking the Cleveland Cavaliers last night in a tilt that went to OT in a 122-119 loss at home. Now exhausted and off a red eye to get here the 76ers are at a disadvantage. Finch is 13-3 ATS in home games after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA with the average ppg diff clicking in at +11.9. NBA Favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games against opponent hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games are 38-3 L/5 seasons for a 93% conversion rate for bettors with the average ppg diff clicking in at +11.1 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on the Minnesota Wolves to cover |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Arkansas v. Stanford UNDER 154.5 | 77-74 | Win | 100 | 4 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Indiana State v. Pepperdine UNDER 159 | 90-82 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Michigan v. Memphis UNDER 157.5 | 67-71 | Win | 100 | 11 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Michigan +1.5 v. Memphis | 67-71 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan has opened the season winning its first three games by 23.7 points before suffering its first loss against Long Beach State, 94-86, at Crisler Center in a freakish back and forth event. Note: Howard is 35-18 ATS after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MICHIGAN.( Upset by Long Beach St last time out) Rebound redemption mode in play. Michigan has scored 45-plus first half points in all four games; the Wolverines have scored 85-plus points in all four games; U-M has had at least one 20-plus point scorer in all four games; and the Maize and Blue has had 38-plus rebounds in all four games and matchup well vs the Tigers attack. MICHIGAN is 11-1 ATS when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days over the last 2 seasons. MICHIGAN is 88-57 ATS in all tournament games since 1997. CBB underdog (MICHIGAN) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in a non-conference game between two teams from major division 1-A conferences are 35-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Michigan to cover Michigan to cover |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Loyola-Chicago v. Creighton UNDER 145.5 | 65-88 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Colorado State v. Boston College UNDER 147.5 | 86-74 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 12 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Long Beach State v. UL - Lafayette UNDER 151.5 | 82-92 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-22-23 | Appalachian State v. Murray State UNDER 147 | 67-57 | Win | 100 | 7 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Toledo +3.5 v. New Mexico | 84-92 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. • Toledo 4-0 leads the MAC in FOUR categories — 52.2 FG%, 44.4 3PTFG%, 10.7 spg, and a 1.7 A/TO ratio. Toledo to cover |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Toledo v. New Mexico UNDER 162 | 84-92 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Kansas v. Marquette UNDER 157.5 | 59-73 | Win | 100 | 10 h 7 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Jazz v. Lakers OVER 235.5 | 99-131 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 46 m | Show | |
The last four meetings between the Lakers and Jazz have all eclipsed this total with a combined average of 253.25 oog going on the board. My own projections for this contest come in the high 230s to the low 240s giving us a significant edge to the over. Utah has consistently played run and gun ball with 7 of their L/9 going over the offered number and Im betting they drag the Lakers into a wide open tilt here today that goes over the digits.Hardy is 10-1 OVER vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of UTAH with a combined average of 239.3 ppg scored.Ham in 36 games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LA LAKERS has seen a. combined average of 237.1 ppg go on the board.UTAH in its L/57 as an underdog over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 237.2 ppg scored.UTAH L/22 against Pacific division opponents over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 242 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Hofstra v. Wright State UNDER 160.5 | 85-76 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 49 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Colorado v. Florida State UNDER 152 | 71-77 | Win | 100 | 3 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Georgia Southern +5.5 v. Northeastern | 76-93 | Loss | -110 | 2 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Georgia Southern to cover |
|||||||
11-21-23 | Buffalo v. UL - Lafayette UNDER 153.5 | 60-68 | Win | 100 | 4 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play under |