| Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08-09-26 | Zach Bauchou -135 v. Erik Van Rooyen | 67-77 | Win | 100 | 4 h 7 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Zach Bauchou -135 Our Edge: The market is correctly pricing Bauchou as the better golfer, but recreational bettors chasing the live leaderboard are the ones creating value at -135 against a Van Rooyen ball-striking week that our framework flags as an outlier due for regression. Statistical Edges: • Baseline SG: Total: Bauchou sits at +0.224 (DataGolf rank 110) versus Van Rooyen at -0.348 (rank 190). That is a 0.572 stroke-per-round baseline gap, and it exists precisely because Van Rooyen's underlying profile is a bottom-tier PGA skill set. • SG: Approach (baseline vs. live): Bauchou's live +2.30 SG Approach through three rounds is directly consistent with his +0.153 baseline. Van Rooyen's +2.31 SG Approach sits on top of a -0.345 baseline, meaning his approach week is the anomaly, not the signal. • DataGolf win probability: Bauchou 0.46% versus Van Rooyen 0.21%. On top-20 finish probability, Bauchou is 14.12% versus Van Rooyen's 7.93%. The predictive model, which already ingests three rounds of live data, still projects Bauchou as roughly twice the golfer over the final round. • SG: Around-the-Green baseline: Van Rooyen's live +2.72 ARG is running against a +0.032 baseline. His three-round short game is a two-and-a-half stroke overperformance that our Bayesian-updated priors do not extend into round four. Psychological Edges: The market on this specific matchup is being pressured by recency bias. Bettors are anchoring to the current leaderboard, where Van Rooyen sits at -10 versus Bauchou at -9, and treating 54 holes as a valid sample for a full talent update. It is not. Three rounds of tee-to-green overperformance against a career-negative baseline is the exact regression setup our framework is built to exploit, and -135 undersells the gap. EDGE ON: Zach Bauchou (-135) I like Zach Bauchou |
|||||||
| 08-09-26 | Keegan Bradley v. Aaron Rai -105 | Top | 68-67 | Win | 100 | 1 h 34 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Aaron Rai -105
|
|||||||
| 08-09-26 | Rosenborg v. Lillestrom +170 | Top | 2-0 | Loss | -100 | 1 h 8 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Lillestrom +170
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Billy Quarantillo +158 v. Diego Ferreira | Top | 0-1 | Loss | -100 | 6 h 32 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Billy Quarantillo +158
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Alexia Thainara -250 v. Amanda Lemos | 1-0 | Win | 100 | 4 h 33 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Alexia Thainara -250
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Storm v. Portland Fire UNDER 180.5 | Top | 93-100 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 48 m | Show |
|
Storm/Portland Fire: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 180½ Our Edge: The market has set 180.5 by anchoring on raw pace and PPG averages, but the underlying shooting profile and lineup attrition put the true expected total meaningfully below the number. Statistical Edges: The line sits 0.7 points above the naive baseline before any downward adjustment for injuries or shooting variance. That is a direct subtraction from the offensive profile the market priced, with rotation minutes flowing to lower-usage replacements. Fresh legs raise the probability of engaged half-court defense and cleaner transition backchecks, which suppresses the fast-break points that inflate WNBA totals. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the availability heuristic. Seattle's 99.9 pace and Portland's 98.16 pace are the salient, easily-recalled inputs, and the 91.3 and 88.5 PPG figures sit at the top of any glance at the box score. Those numbers dominate line-setting because they are what casual bettors reach for first. The base rate the market is discounting is Seattle's broken 28% 3-point shot and Portland's reduced offensive creation without Barker. Our framework updates on the shooting inputs, not the pace narrative. EDGE ON: Under 180.5 (-110) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Rockies +145 v. Cardinals | Top | 8-6 | Win | 145 | 12 h 52 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Rockies +145
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Hamilton v. BC -7 | Top | 24-27 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 18 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON BC -7 -110
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Angels v. Marlins UNDER 8 | 0-7 | Win | 100 | 8 h 17 m | Show | |
|
Angels/Marlins: BENNETT EDGE ON under 8 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has priced Under 8 at -105 while under-weighting a starter-vs-lineup mismatch and a run-suppressing park environment that pushes our fair total closer to 7. Statistical Edges: Combined starter run-prevention this strong is a structural anchor against an over. PHI) with only 6 hits allowed. His xwOBA of .300 confirms the suppression is real, not variance-driven. The projected 6-through-9 slots (Ballesteros, Guzman, Lowe, d'Arnaud) offer minimal extra-base threat against a groundball-heavy Alcantara profile. Environmental variance is zero, which collapses the right tail of run-scoring outcomes that typically drives totals over the number. Psychological Edges: The market is anchored to recency bias around Alcantara's July 22 line at Houston (5 ER on 9 hits), a single outlier flanked by five quality starts. That one box score is disproportionately available in the pricing memory, which is why an 8-run total is even in play with these two starters and this Angels lineup. My framework Bayesian-updates that outing against the .253 xBA / .373 xSLG season baseline and treats it as noise, not signal. The line is paying us to take the base rate. EDGE ON: Under 8 (-105) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Sahith Theegala v. Beau Hossler -105 | Top | 69-66 | Win | 100 | 0 h 27 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Beau Hossler -105
|
|||||||
| 08-08-26 | Coleraine -200 v. Dungannon Swifts | Top | 3-1 | Win | 100 | 3 h 37 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Coleraine -200
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Dodgers v. Diamondbacks +160 | 3-4 | Win | 160 | 14 h 19 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Diamondbacks +160 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Los Angeles's brand equity and Roki Sasaki's velocity narrative, ignoring that the Dodgers are a six-game losing streak dragging two catchers on the IL into a Diamondbacks club that has won 14 of its last 20 at a home price of +160. Statistical Edges: His floor is meaningfully lower than his last three lines suggest. Psychological Edges: The +160 is a textbook halo effect. The market is pricing the Dodgers logo, not the Dodgers roster, and layering in an availability bias around Sasaki's recent 21-strikeout stretch while discounting the July 2 blow-up as noise. Public perception has not yet updated on a six-game skid or the catcher vacancy, and Bayesian-updated priors on a road favorite in this exact spot compress the true gap between these clubs well inside the offered number. EDGE ON: DIAMONDBACKS ML (+160) I like the Diamondbacks |
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Robbie Ring v. Cheyden Leialoha -250 | 0-1 | Win | 100 | 11 h 27 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Cheyden Leialoha -250
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Ottawa v. Saskatchewan -7 | Top | 20-42 | Win | 100 | 9 h 2 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Saskatchewan -7 -110
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Orioles v. Rangers UNDER 8 | Top | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 13 h 54 m | Show |
|
Orioles/Rangers: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 8 Our Edge Statistical Edges PHI, ATL, BOS), giving us a Bayesian-updated floor that the .30-run xERA gap overstates. Psychological Edges Eovaldi's 6-ER, 10-hit line on July 31 is the freshest, most vivid data point in every bettor's mind, and it is doing all the work in pushing this total from 7.5 to 8. The base rate says otherwise: across his prior four starts Eovaldi posted a 2.86 ERA with 32 strikeouts, and his xERA (4.10) is actually below his ERA. Recency bias is inflating the perceived ceiling of a game between two sub-.500 offenses missing three middle-of-order bats in a neutral-run indoor park. EDGE ON: Under 8 (-119) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Dream -4.5 v. Mystics | Top | 74-79 | Loss | -105 | 12 h 32 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Dream -4½ -105
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Trey Waters -225 v. Trukon Carson | Top | 1-0 | Win | 100 | 9 h 22 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Trey Waters -225
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Stevenage FC +232 v. Wycombe Wanderers | Top | 2-1 | Win | 232 | 7 h 14 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Stevenage FC +232
|
|||||||
| 08-07-26 | Sungjae Im v. Alex Fitzpatrick -110 | Top | 68-68 | Push | 0 | 2 h 37 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Alex Fitzpatrick -110 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Sungjae Im's name recognition as a PGA Tour veteran, ignoring that Alex Fitzpatrick is currently ranked 52 spots higher in DataGolf's schedule-adjusted skill index and holds the more valuable ball-striking profile for Sedgefield. Statistical Edges: That is a 0.35-stroke per round gap in the underlying skill baseline, which a -110 pick'em line does not price. On a 7,131-yard par 70 where wedge and mid-iron proximity dictates birdie conversion, this is the category that matters most. Fitzpatrick's ball-striking edge is not just baseline, it showed up on the property Thursday. The model already sees the gap. Psychological Edges: This is a textbook availability heuristic trap. Im is the recallable name, six years of PGA Tour Sundays and a familiar swing, while Fitzpatrick registers as the sponsor exemption who happened to win the team event in New Orleans. The market is paying for the ease of remembering Im, not the underlying inputs. There is also a halo effect on Im's short game (+0.371 SG: ARG, +0.267 SG: Putt) that gets extrapolated into a full profile, when the tee-to-green data says Fitzpatrick is the more complete player at this course this week. Bayesian-updated skill measures already discount the R1 putting variance the opposition case leans on. Take the higher-ranked golfer at a coin-flip price. EDGE ON: Alex Fitzpatrick (-110) I like Alex Fitzpatrick |
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Cruz Azul +177 v. Philadelphia | Top | 1-0 | Win | 177 | 9 h 13 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Cruz Azul +177
|
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Panthers -1 v. Cardinals | Top | 33-30 | Win | 100 | 12 h 19 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Panthers -1 +100
|
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Calgary v. Toronto OVER 67.5 | Top | 30-33 | Loss | -112 | 7 h 20 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 67½
|
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Marlins +133 v. Braves | 3-11 | Loss | -100 | 11 h 58 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Marlins +133 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Martin Perez's ERA and Atlanta's home win streak, both narrative artifacts that ignore the regression signal buried in the underlying pitching data and the +133 price on a lineup with a real contact profile. Statistical Edges: The Statcast profile is roughly half a run better than the surface line, and the market is paying the surface line. Two of his last three outings produced one earned run or fewer, a Bayesian update the +133 price is not respecting. Miami is 58-57 with a lineup that leans right-handed against left-handed Braves starter Martin Perez, whose 3.24 ERA sits well below his career baseline and screams positive-variance regression. Our framework prices this closer to 47-48% once you fold in the xERA differential and Perez's regression profile. That gap is the bet. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the availability heuristic. Atlanta's 69-45 record and their eight-game home streak are the freshest, most vivid data points, and public bettors are anchoring to them at -145. That anchoring crowds out the base rate: Perez is pitching a full run above his expected outputs, and Junk's Statcast profile has been mispriced by his ERA all season. Sharp resistance drifting the number toward Miami is the tell. EDGE ON: MARLINS ML (+133) I like the Marlins |
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Aces v. Fever UNDER 195.5 | Top | 86-84 | Win | 100 | 9 h 24 m | Show |
|
Aces/Fever: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 195½ Our Edge: The market has anchored the 195.5 total to Indiana's recent scoring pyrotechnics without properly discounting the compromised availability of the two players actually generating that offense, creating a value gap on the Under. Statistical Edges: Removing or restricting either compresses the offensive ceiling the total is priced against. Fewer possessions, fewer points. In matched-pace games the possession count converges toward the road team's operating tempo, which structurally caps the game total below the market's implied 98 possessions per side. My framework discounts that number heavily against league priors when projecting a single-game total. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by a textbook availability heuristic. Indiana's 102.6 PPG over the last 10 is the freshest, most vivid data point in the public's memory, and the total has been set to chase that number rather than the underlying inputs. Anchoring compounds the effect: sportsbooks moved the number up as the Fever's scoring average climbed, but the line has not been meaningfully re-adjusted for Clark and Boston operating below full mobility. We are selling the narrative price and buying the base rate. EDGE ON: Under 195.5 (-105) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Jiri Lehecka v. Alexander Blockx +165 | Top | 2-0 | Loss | -100 | 10 h 12 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Alexander Blockx +165
|
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Hideki Matsuyama +100 v. Jackson Koivun | Top | 65-67 | Win | 100 | 0 h 20 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Hideki Matsuyama +100 Our Edge: The market is pricing Hideki Matsuyama as a coin-flip against a 21-year-old with five professional starts because narrative bias is drowning out a three-fold gap in Strokes Gained Total, and Sedgefield Country Club is the exact venue where that gap should compound. Statistical Edges: • SG: Total: Matsuyama's baseline of 1.261 is nearly three times Jackson Koivun's 0.447, placing Matsuyama at DataGolf rank 18 versus Koivun at 26. A pick'em price implies parity the underlying skill model does not support. • SG: Approach: Matsuyama gains 0.545 strokes per round on approach against Koivun's 0.317. Sedgefield is a 7,131-yard par 70 with tight corridors, which is a course profile that amplifies iron play and punishes misses, exactly where Matsuyama's edge is largest. • SG: Around the Green: The chasm is 0.413 to 0.036, an 11x differential. On a Bermuda short-grass venue where scrambling separates the field on a Thursday, that is the single most schedule-adjusted number in this matchup. • Driving Accuracy: Matsuyama sits at +0.02 versus Koivun's -0.011. Koivun's +2.734 distance advantage is real, but Sedgefield's fairway-first design converts that length into a liability more often than an asset. Psychological Edges: This price is a textbook availability cascade. Koivun's 25-under win at the 3M Open two weeks ago, a three-stroke beat of Scottie Scheffler and a T5 here as an amateur in 2025, are the two most easily recalled data points in the field, and the market has anchored to them. Bayesian updating discounts a five-start professional sample against a decade-long Matsuyama baseline that includes a 2026 Genesis Invitational win at Riviera. The story is priced. The skill is not. EDGE ON: MATSUYAMA ML (+100) I like Hideki Matsuyama |
|||||||
| 08-06-26 | Angels v. Orioles -183 | Top | 4-1 | Loss | -183 | 5 h 54 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Orioles -183 Our Edge: We are exploiting a pitcher-quality mismatch that the market has priced correctly on one side and underpriced on the other, where Angels starter Ryan Johnson's peripheral profile still projects him as a bottom-decile arm regardless of any xERA regression argument. Statistical Edges: Young sits at .320 xwOBA over 439 PA, a full tier better on a larger sample. Young has completed at least 5.2 innings in four of his last five, including a 7-inning, 1-ER start at Houston on July 19. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by a mild anchoring effect around Young's xERA gap (3.31 ERA vs. 4.30 xERA), which is fueling the "Baltimore is overpriced" narrative on this number. My framework Bayesian-updates that gap against the far larger gap on the other side: Johnson's 7.63 ERA over a 211-PA sample is not a small-sample mirage waiting to correct in one start against a lineup featuring Gunnar Henderson and Pete Alonso. The public perception gap here is that a sub-.500 home team can't justify -183, but the pitching input dominates the season-long records at this price. EDGE ON: ORIOLES ML (-183) I like the Orioles |
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Sparks v. Sky OVER 189.5 | 88-95 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 45 m | Show | |
|
Sparks/Sky: BENNETT EDGE ON over 189½ Our Edge: The market has set 189.5 based on the raw pace inputs while pricing in the absence of Chicago's injured scorers, but the correct read is that a shorthanded Sky roster forced into higher usage against the Sparks' 110.7 defensive rating is a mechanism for MORE points, not fewer. Statistical Edges: Combined possession volume is the structural foundation for clearing 189.5. A depleted Chicago offense still gets uncontested looks against a unit surrendering points at that rate. Their 107 offensive rating on 102.3 pace is the volume-plus-efficiency profile that fuels totals. Fewer wasted possessions on the home side means more shot attempts inside the total window. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic tied to Chicago's injury list. The absences of Jackson, Diggins, and Stevens are salient, easy to recall, and easy to translate into a mental subtraction of scoring. What the anchoring misses is that Kamilla Cardoso and Natasha Cloud absorb the vacated usage against a defense ranked in the bottom tier of the L10 sample, and the Sparks' own 0.19 TOV% donates transition possessions the other way. The narrative subtracts points; the mechanics add them. Both teams cleared 100 in their most recent outings, and the underlying inputs favor a repeat. EDGE ON: Over 189.5 (-110) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Cardinals v. Yankees UNDER 8.5 | Top | 3-1 | Win | 101 | 13 h 37 m | Show |
|
Cardinals/Yankees: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 8½ Our Edge: We are exploiting a total anchored to Yankee Stadium's historical run environment while the market underweights the fact that the Yankees' lineup has been stripped of its three most productive bats. Statistical Edges: That is the entire heart of the order gone, and the replacement bats do not carry equivalent expected slugging. The underlying profile is stable, not fluky, meaning the suppression is real against a compromised lineup. Bayesian-updated against his season baseline, his expected run allowance in this specific matchup sits well below league average. His 4.14 ERA overstates volatility because his most recent start reset the priors on his command. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic tied to Yankee Stadium's short-porch reputation and Warren's 4.46 xERA blow-up outings from earlier this month. The 82 degrees and southerly wind reinforce the narrative of a launching-pad environment. What that framing ignores is that the launching pad needs launchers. The Cardinals lineup below Wetherholt and Burleson does not project as a slugging unit, and the Yankees without Judge, Bellinger, and Stanton are a league-average offense at best. The number is priced for the ballpark, not the personnel. EDGE ON: Under 8.5 (+101) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Wings v. Mystics +3.5 | Top | 92-96 | Win | 100 | 12 h 9 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Mystics +3½ -110 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Dallas's raw offensive rating and Paige Bueckers' name recognition, ignoring that Washington already owns this matchup on their own floor with a rest and defense profile built to shorten the game. Statistical Edges: Dallas's +8 net rating is doing the heavy lifting on this line, but Washington's +1 in a slower context translates to a much tighter true-talent gap than the spread implies. Psychological Edges: This price is a clean case of the availability heuristic. Bueckers highlights, Fudd shooting reels, and the Wings' 113.9 offensive rating are the easy-to-recall inputs, so the market extrapolates a blowout script that Washington's home floor has repeatedly refused to produce. The halo effect around Dallas's rookie backcourt is doing real work here, papering over a Mystics group that is 7-3 in its last 10 with a superior defensive rating and a rest advantage. Our framework buys the points, not the narrative. EDGE ON: MYSTICS +3.5 (-110) I like the Mystics |
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Rays -158 v. Rockies | 4-0 | Win | 100 | 8 h 42 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Rays -158 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has priced the Rays' road favorite tag through the lens of Coors Field intimidation while ignoring that Rockies starter Tomoyuki Sugano owns one of the worst Statcast profiles in the league. Statistical Edges: That is a 2.64-run expected earned run differential, and Sugano's raw 4.47 ERA is already the worse of the two despite Coors run-suppression narratives working against Martinez, not for him. Martinez sits at .329 xwOBA and .445 xSLG, a full tier tighter. Rockies 45-69 (.395), a 198-point winning-percentage spread that historically converts to roughly -170 to -180 on a neutral field before pitcher adjustments. Kansas City) came with just 2 strikeouts and zero walks, a pitch-to-contact profile that is the exact archetype Coors Field punishes when the Rays lineup, led by Yandy Diaz and Junior Caminero, gets its swings. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the availability heuristic around Coors Field. Recent memory of any Denver box score primes bettors to shade toward the home dog, and Martinez's 6-ER shelling against the White Sox on 7/31 gives the recency-bias narrative a second lever to pull. Both stories crowd out the base-rate signal: Sugano's underlying metrics are meaningfully worse than Martinez's, and the win-percentage gap alone justifies this number before park effects enter the model. We are buying the quantitative floor the narrative is discounting. EDGE ON: RAYS ML (-158) I like the Rays |
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Sturm Graz v. Fenerbahce -280 | Top | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 3 h 28 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Fenerbahce -280
|
|||||||
| 08-05-26 | Ignacio Buse v. Cameron Norrie -200 | Top | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 5 h 56 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Cameron Norrie -200
|
|||||||
| 08-04-26 | Cardinals +161 v. Yankees | Top | 0-2 | Loss | -100 | 10 h 30 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Cardinals +161
|
|||||||
| 08-04-26 | A's +120 v. Reds | 4-5 | Loss | -100 | 7 h 12 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON A's +120 Our Edge: We are exploiting a name-recognition mispricing on Brady Singer, whose surface ERA masks a nearly full-run gap to his expected performance, while the market is anchoring the A's price to their 45-67 record rather than the pitching matchup actually on the mound. Statistical Edges: • xERA delta: Reds starter Brady Singer carries a 4.97 xERA against A's starter J.T. Ginn's 3.96 xERA. That is a 1.01-run gap in expected run prevention favoring the road side, and the price implies the opposite. • xwOBA allowed: Singer is yielding a .341 xwOBA on 479 plate appearances, versus Ginn at .308 xwOBA on 457 PA. The contact quality Singer is surrendering is meaningfully louder, and his .448 xSLG allowed confirms the barrel profile. • Ginn's recent ceiling: In his most recent outing on July 18 against Washington, Ginn went 6.1 IP, 1 H, 0 ER, 7 K. His schedule-adjusted stuff shows a viable top-half-of-rotation profile the market is not paying for at +120. • Singer's command trend: In his July 29 start against Cleveland, Singer walked 4 and allowed 7 hits and 4 ER in 4.1 IP. His zone efficiency is trending the wrong way heading into a start where the umpire and park will not save him. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the halo effect on Brady Singer's name and by an availability heuristic tied to the A's ugly 45-67 record. Recent won-loss volatility crowds out the base rate that this matchup is decided by two starters, and the underlying Statcast layer has already flagged Singer as one of the most regression-vulnerable arms on the slate. We are buying the pitching-matchup edge at a record-anchored price. EDGE ON: A'S ML (+120) I like the A's |
|||||||
| 08-04-26 | Bodo Glimt v. Union Saint-Gilloise +145 | Top | 3-3 | Loss | -100 | 5 h 13 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Union Saint-Gilloise +145
|
|||||||
| 08-04-26 | Zachary Svajda +130 v. Denis Shapovalov | Top | 2-1 | Win | 130 | 4 h 43 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Zachary Svajda +130
|
|||||||
| 08-03-26 | Jacob Fearnley v. Adrian Mannarino +150 | Top | 2-0 | Loss | -100 | 10 h 26 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Adrian Mannarino +150
|
|||||||
| 08-03-26 | Mercury v. Sky OVER 178.5 | Top | 106-101 | Win | 100 | 14 h 38 m | Show |
|
Mercury/Sky: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 178½ Our Edge: The market is anchored to Chicago's injury report and undervaluing a possession-volume environment where both teams operate at top-of-league pace and Phoenix defends at a replacement level. Statistical Edges: Volume is the dominant input to totals, and this game has it. Psychological Edges: The 178.5 number is being suppressed by an availability heuristic tied to Chicago's injury list. Rickea Jackson's season-ending knee and Skylar Diggins' absence are the easiest facts to recall, so the market subtracts their 32.2 combined PPG in a straight line and moves on. That framing ignores usage reallocation. Sydney Taylor is already averaging 14.7 PPG in 20.8 minutes, Cardoso (14.3 PPG) draws elevated post touches, and Vandersloot inflates assist volume in a faster tempo. The bias is treating counting stats as fixed rather than distributional, and it's mispricing a 200-possession game against a 108.6 defensive rating. EDGE ON: Over 178.5 (-110) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 08-03-26 | Nationals v. Phillies UNDER 9.5 | Top | 3-6 | Win | 100 | 10 h 52 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 9½
|
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | Sun v. Wings OVER 172 | Top | 63-83 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 47 m | Show |
|
Sun/Wings: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 172 Our Edge: The market has anchored 172 to Connecticut's shorthanded roster and last month's 86-83 rock fight, underweighting the pace-plus-efficiency profile Dallas brings to a game the Sun can no longer slow down. Statistical Edges: That combination, high efficiency and possession retention, is the cleanest input for clearing a total. Olivia Nelson-Ododa at 21.3 minutes is not a rim-protection anchor at Griner's usage. A blended pace north of 95 against a 108.4 Dallas defense that still allows clean transition looks gives both sides volume. Their 20% turnover rate feeds live-ball transitions Dallas converts at a 114.1 clip. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by recency bias anchored to the July 2 meeting, an 86-83, 169-point game played in a different roster context. Bettors are extrapolating that number forward while ignoring that Connecticut's defensive floor has collapsed and Dallas has since posted a 7-3 stretch scoring 91.2 per game. The narrative says 'shorthanded Sun equals ugly game.' The math says shorthanded Sun equals more possessions, worse defense, and a Dallas offense with no reason to decelerate. EDGE ON: Over 172 (-110) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | Sparks v. Portland Fire +0.5 | 106-101 | Loss | -115 | 7 h 17 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Portland Fire 0½ -115 Our Edge: We are exploiting a stale line that has not repriced for the Sparks trading their leading scorer hours before tip, taking a Portland Fire team whose schedule-adjusted efficiency already outperforms Los Angeles across the last 10 games. Statistical Edges: The listed pick'em price implies parity the underlying numbers dispute. Portland is the more efficient offense on a per-possession basis even before accounting for the Sparks' backcourt depletion. With Monique Akoa Makani listed Out, Erica Wheeler (9 PPG) and Ariel Atkins (9.4 PPG) inherit that load cold, against a Sparks defensive rating of 112 that offers no cushion. The Fire dictate a slower possession count at home, which shrinks variance and protects a half-point cushion. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic anchored to the July 12 head-to-head result, when a fully-loaded Sparks roster won by 17. That result is the salient data point bettors are recalling, and it is crowding out the base rate that the roster which produced it no longer exists. Books have not fully repriced the Plum trade, and public perception is still treating Los Angeles as the healthier side while Portland absorbs the Barker headline. Bayesian updating on the actual rosters taking the floor pushes this line closer to Fire -2. EDGE ON: PORTLAND FIRE +0.5 (-115) I like the Portland Fire |
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | X Wang +135 v. Sara Bejlek | Top | 1-2 | Loss | -100 | 1 h 19 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON X Wang +135
|
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | White Sox +140 v. Rays | 9-1 | Win | 140 | 5 h 24 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON White Sox +140 Our Edge: The market is pricing this line off surface ERAs and the Rays' home record, but both starters carry xERAs that are nearly a full run above their actual results, collapsing the pitching gap the +140 implies. Statistical Edges: His xwOBA of .333 vs. actual wOBA of .310 confirms hitters are squaring him up more than the box score shows. On xERA alone, the true pitching edge shrinks to roughly half a run, not the gap +140 suggests. Boston on 7/17). His floor is materially lower than his headline 3.74 ERA implies. He is closer to his ERA than Jax is to his. Psychological Edges: The market is anchored to the Rays' 65-45 record and Jax's sub-4 ERA, a textbook halo effect where a favored team's headline pitcher inherits credit his expected metrics do not support. Layer in recency bias from Jax's 10-strikeout outing on 7/28 and the price gets pushed past what a Bayesian-updated projection would justify. At +140, we are being paid a full underdog premium for what the underlying data reads as a coin-flip start. EDGE ON: WHITE SOX ML (+140) I like the White Sox |
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | Nationals +115 v. Braves | Top | 2-4 | Loss | -100 | 6 h 14 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Nationals +115 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has priced this game on team records and division standing while ignoring a starting pitcher mismatch that our framework values at meaningfully more than the +115 implied probability suggests. Statistical Edges: Ritchie's xwOBA-against of .336 sits roughly 26 points above Cavalli's .310, a material quality separation the moneyline is not respecting. Free baserunners against a lineup optimized to work counts is a compounding failure mode. Our Bayesian-updated projection for his floor tonight is meaningfully higher than the sample of one bad Pittsburgh outing on July 5 would suggest. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by a halo effect. The Braves' 66-45 record, home-park reputation, and star-branded lineup (Acuna, Olson, Riley) crowd out the specific input that actually decides today's game: the identity of the man on the mound in a Braves uniform. Bettors are pricing Atlanta as Atlanta rather than pricing Ritchie as Ritchie. Availability of recent Braves highlights does the rest, anchoring the number a full tier above where the pitcher-versus-pitcher math lands. EDGE ON: NATIONALS ML (+115) I like the Nationals |
|||||||
| 08-02-26 | Luzern v. Sion -102 | Top | 0-3 | Win | 100 | 1 h 12 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Sion -102
|
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | William Zepeda +135 v. Lamont Roach Jr. | Top | 1-0 | Win | 135 | 15 h 28 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON William Zepeda +135
|
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Diamondbacks +145 v. Guardians | Top | 12-8 | Win | 145 | 12 h 54 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Diamondbacks +145
|
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Nationals +169 v. Braves | 3-8 | Loss | -100 | 9 h 25 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Nationals +169 Our Edge: The market is anchored to the Braves' 10-game standings lead and Miles Mikolas' 5.65 surface ERA, pricing Washington as a +169 dog in a game where park conditions, road resilience, and lineup power close the gap the number implies. Statistical Edges: At +169, the implied win probability is roughly 37%, and the road profile alone suggests a truer number closer to 42-44%. Rain-affected starts historically compress starter workloads and hand innings to bullpens earlier, which flattens the pitching gap between Mikolas and Braves starter Reynaldo Lopez (4-3, 3.64 ERA). He is a below-average starter, not a disaster, and the market is pricing the disaster. In a park that plays neutral-to-hitter-friendly, one swing erases the pitching edge the price is charging for. Psychological Edges: This line is a textbook case of the availability heuristic. The 65-45 Braves record and Mikolas' bloated ERA are the two most easily recalled data points, and the market has anchored to both without discounting for weather variance, Washington's road profile, or Lopez's own pre-last-start inconsistency. The story the number tells is a mismatch. The underlying inputs describe a coin flip priced as a two-to-one dog. EDGE ON: NATIONALS ML (+169) I like the Nationals |
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Liberty -2.5 v. Mercury | Top | 94-92 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 19 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Liberty -2½ -115 Our Edge Statistical Edges The Mercury are winning coin-flip games while being outscored per possession. Phoenix counters with Copper (20.7 PPG) but no secondary creator averaging above 14.8. Psychological Edges Phoenix is 5-5 in their last 10, New York is 4-6, and the line has anchored to that surface-level split rather than the per-possession reality where the Liberty are the more efficient team on both sides of the ledger. The absences of Sabally and Fiebich feed an availability heuristic: their names are top-of-mind, so the market overweights the missing production and underweights that Stewart, Ionescu, and Jones are all healthy and combining for 51.4 PPG. My framework Bayesian-updates the record against the net rating differential, and the resulting fair line sits closer to Liberty -4 than -2.5. At -115 we are buying a full point of value the narrative is refusing to price in. EDGE ON: LIBERTY -2.5 (-115) I like the Liberty |
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Calgary v. Hamilton OVER 59.5 | Top | 44-20 | Win | 100 | 1 h 1 m | Show |
|
Calgary/Hamilton: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 59½ Our Edge The market is pricing 59.5 as an extreme number for two 3-4 CFL teams, but our framework reads the pace signal, not the record, and the pace signal points squarely to a shootout environment in Hamilton. Statistical Edges • Pace precedent: Calgary's most recent high-leverage sample produced a 78-point game against Winnipeg (37-41), a data point that anchors their defensive variance profile far above their 3-4 record suggests. • Quarterback volatility: Tre Ford's scrambling profile generates off-script possessions that inflate both explosive-play rate and opponent field position, the two inputs most correlated with CFL totals clearing 55. • Environmental load: A 26C air temperature with a 33C feels-like reading is a documented second-half defensive fatigue driver in the CFL, where 20-yard fields and a third-down clock compress recovery windows already. • Base-rate context: The June 7 meeting between these teams landed at 56 points on a neutral-weather day, meaning the schedule-adjusted baseline for this specific matchup sits within a field goal of the number before any pace or heat adjustment. Psychological Edges The market is trapped by the availability heuristic around weather. A 60% rain chance and two ruled-out Hamilton receivers (Bridges, Ternowski) are the salient, easily-recalled inputs, so the total has held at 59.5 rather than climbing toward the 62-63 range the pace and heat inputs justify. Bettors are anchoring to a conservative ground-game script that CFL rulebook mechanics, three downs, wide field, active rouge scoring, actively punish. The recency bias toward these teams' 3-4 records is doing the same work, suppressing a number that the Calgary 78-point game and the June 7 base rate both argue should be higher. EDGE ON: Over 59.5 (-115) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Robert Valentin -155 v. Dusko Todorovic | 1-0 | Win | 100 | 6 h 51 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Robert Valentin -155
|
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Cameron Young -135 v. Patrick Cantlay | 68-70 | Win | 100 | 3 h 48 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Cameron Young -135 Our Edge: The market is pricing Cameron Young at -135 based on his headline-grabbing course-record 61 and No. 3 OWGR pedigree, but the underlying live data reveals a far more sustainable edge than the price implies, Young is winning this matchup through repeatable ball-striking while Cantlay is riding a putter that regresses. Statistical Edges: Putting variance is the least sticky metric round-to-round. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the halo effect around Cantlay's putting round. A 5.07 SG: Putt performance is visually spectacular and easy to recall, which anchors bettors to a story of Cantlay "finding it" on the greens. My framework Bayesian-updates that number hard against his season baseline of 0.180 SG: Putt, treating it as high-variance noise rather than a durable signal. Young's driving distance rating of 11.514 versus Cantlay's 3.898 is the structural advantage the price is underweighting. EDGE ON: Cameron Young (-135) I like Cameron Young |
|||||||
| 08-01-26 | Matt Wallace v. Rickie Fowler -130 | Top | 69-67 | Win | 100 | 4 h 35 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Rickie Fowler -130
|
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | Twins +174 v. Mariners | 5-3 | Win | 174 | 14 h 28 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Twins +174 Our Edge Statistical Edges A team with two more wins is priced as a +174 dog, which implies a ~36% win probability. That is a valuation gap driven by narrative, not standings. Recent Form: Miller's 2.65 xERA anchors the price, but his last three starts show 11 earned runs across 16 innings, including 5 ER to Texas on 7/24 and 4 walks against Miami on 7/9. The market is pricing the season-long xERA, not the recent command volatility. He is not elite, but his expected profile is roughly a full run better than the surface number the market is punishing. That is a run-environment input the +174 price does not reflect. Psychological Edges The market has anchored to Miller's 90th-percentile xERA and extrapolated dominance forward, while discounting the recent regression and the offensive vacuum behind him. Availability bias reinforces it: Matthews' 8-ER Cubs start is the memorable data point, crowding out his 7-inning, 1-ER outing at Houston. The price pays for the story, not the distribution. EDGE ON: TWINS ML (+174) I like the Twins |
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | Guadalajara -143 v. Puebla | Top | 1-1 | Loss | -143 | 12 h 29 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Guadalajara -143
|
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | Wings v. Mystics +3 | Top | 75-81 | Win | 100 | 10 h 2 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Mystics +3 -110 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Dallas's raw scoring volume and their 23-point win in the first meeting, which prices Washington's current defensive identity and role-specific ATS profile out of the number. Statistical Edges: In a projected slower game (Mystics pace 91.44 vs. Wings 95.41), the defensive team dictates possession count and compresses margin. That is not a narrative, it is a role-specific base rate the market is discounting in favor of season-long point differential. Both teams sit at 7-3 in the L10 sample, yet the price treats the road side as materially superior. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability cascade around the May 18 blowout. That result is the easiest data point to recall, so it is doing disproportionate work in the current line, even though the underlying inputs (defensive rating gap, rest differential, home ATS role) have shifted since. Layer in recency bias from Dallas's 91.4 PPG headline number, and the price is paying for a version of the Wings that just posted 81 points in a blown lead against Atlanta. Three points is the buffer that closes the gap between the narrative and the numbers. EDGE ON: MYSTICS +3 (-110) I like the Mystics |
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | White Sox +140 v. Rays | Top | 6-1 | Win | 140 | 12 h 48 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON White Sox +140 Our Edge: The market has anchored to Nick Martinez's 2.45 ERA and priced the White Sox as heavy road underdogs, but the Statcast profile shows the two starters are functionally identical and the +140 price overpays for a run-prevention mirage. Statistical Edges: White Sox starter Erick Fedde sits at 4.25 ERA / 4.71 xERA. The true-talent delta between these arms is under half a run, not the 1.80 the surface stats suggest. The contact he's allowing is louder than the results, and Bayesian-updated baselines expect that gap to close. The implied win probability of roughly 41.7% is well below what schedule-adjusted run differential supports for a sub-.500 gap. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by a textbook availability heuristic. Martinez's 2.45 ERA and Tampa's 40 home wins are the salient, easy-to-recall inputs, while xERA and xwOBA require actually opening the Savant page. The bullpen-fatigue narrative from back-to-back extra-inning games is real but already baked into a price this generous. When the underlying contact quality is this close, +140 on the analytically comparable arm is the number to take. EDGE ON: WHITE SOX ML (+140) I like the White Sox |
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | Christopher Gotterup v. Xander Schauffele -110 | Top | 73-66 | Win | 100 | 3 h 8 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Xander Schauffele -110 Our Edge: The market is treating this as a coin flip because Gotterup's 2026 win total is doing the talking, but the position on the board and the baseline skill data both favor Schauffele at a fair number. Statistical Edges: Head-to-head 36-hole matchups at this price are decided far more by starting position than by ancillary form narratives. The market is pricing Gotterup as the clear favorite in a spot where the underlying long-run number tilts the other way. In a late-wave Friday at Detroit Golf Club, where scrambling separates rounds, that gap is a leveraged edge. Psychological Edges: The market is pricing an availability heuristic. Gotterup has three wins in 2026 and a Round 1 that lit up the ball-striking columns (3.04 SG:T2G), so the recent, easily-recalled evidence dominates the anchor. What the anchor ignores is that Schauffele's Round 1 lead was built on 2.07 strokes putting, exactly the kind of variance the public frames as "unsustainable" while ignoring that the stroke cushion is already banked. Bayesian updating on 36-hole matchups rewards the player already ahead with the higher baseline SG:Total, not the trailing player whose ceiling scenario requires putter regression AND continued ball-striking dominance in the same round. EDGE ON: XANDER SCHAUFFELE ML (-110) I like Xander Schauffele |
|||||||
| 07-31-26 | Keegan Bradley +110 v. Rickie Fowler | 68-68 | Push | 0 | 1 h 27 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Keegan Bradley +110 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Rickie Fowler's opening 63 and his 2023 title at Detroit Golf Club, mispricing Keegan Bradley despite a superior ball-striking profile and higher baseline skill. Statistical Edges: • SG: Total (baseline): Bradley grades at 0.89 versus Fowler's 0.795, and DataGolf's predictive model backs the gap with a higher win projection (1.29% vs. 1.15%) despite Bradley sitting 44th in OWGR to Fowler's 41st. • SG: Approach (Round 1): Bradley gained 3.93 strokes on approach, outpacing Fowler's 3.49. Bradley's baseline SG: Approach of 0.425 is nearly double Fowler's 0.237, the most repeatable input in the profile. • Driving profile: Bradley holds a 6.415 driving distance skill edge against Fowler's 0.121, with comparable accuracy. On a 7,328-yard Donald Ross layout that just underwent a full Tyler Rae renovation, length off the tee is a structural advantage, not a stylistic one. • Round 1 SG: Tee-to-Green: Bradley posted 3.91 SG: T2G to Fowler's 4.13, essentially neutral. Fowler's two-stroke position advantage was built almost entirely on 2.07 SG: Putting, the least predictive category in the DataGolf hierarchy. Psychological Edges: This price is a textbook availability heuristic. Fowler's 63 is the most recent, most vivid data point in the market's memory, and his 2023 win here reinforces a narrative that recall-optimizes to "Rickie owns this course." That story overweights putting variance (Fowler's Round 1 was 33% putting-driven) and underweights the fact that Bradley's iron game and tee-to-green profile are the more durable signals. Our framework Bayesian-updates the two-stroke gap against the underlying strokes-gained inputs and finds Bradley's floor materially higher than +110 implies. At an implied 47.6%, we are getting a small-favorite skill profile priced as a clear underdog. EDGE ON: BRADLEY ML (+110) I like Keegan Bradley |
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | Red Sox v. A's UNDER 10.5 | 5-4 | Win | 100 | 13 h 1 m | Show | |
|
Red Sox/A's: BENNETT EDGE ON under 10½ Our Edge: The market is pricing this 10.5 total off Sutter Health Park's reputation as a launching pad, but our framework says the depleted lineup profiles on both sides create a run-scoring floor that sits below the venue's inflated ceiling. Statistical Edges: This is a legitimate top-of-rotation contact profile, not a mirage waiting to correct in one start. Bayesian-updated against his season baseline, the July 25 outing is the outlier, not the trend. The A's are missing Rooker (60-Day), Langeliers, and Gelof. Both clubs have surrendered their top-half wOBA bats, and the market has not repriced the lineups it is actually watching hit. Sutter Health Park's carry environment is temperature-sensitive, and 72° is the low end of the summer distribution, not the 90°+ conditions the park factor was built on. Psychological Edges: The 10.5 line is a textbook availability heuristic play. Bettors recall the viral Sacramento home run clips and Barnett's 4.75 xERA, and price the total off those easy-to-retrieve images. What is harder to retrieve, and therefore underweighted, is that both lineups are running out replacement-level bats against a pitcher with a .302 xwOBA. The narrative is anchored to the park. The roster sheet is anchored to July call-ups. EDGE ON: Under 10.5 (-110) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | Giants +120 v. Padres | Top | 4-1 | Win | 120 | 14 h 12 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Giants +120 Our Edge: The market is pricing this game off a five-game Padres win streak and a 46-62 Giants record, but the underlying pitching matchup skews meaningfully toward San Francisco once you strip out the narrative layer. Statistical Edges: That is a 0.70 ERA gap in favor of the road team getting plus money. His xwOBA of .320 versus a wOBA of .300 tells the same story. The Statcast floor says he has been the beneficiary of soft contact luck that Bayesian updating discounts against a longer baseline. This is a pitcher living above his true talent line. The inning-eating floor is not there. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability cascade. San Diego's five-game winning streak is the most cognitively accessible data point, and it is crowding out the base rate on a starter whose xERA sits 46 points above his ERA. Recency bias is doing the heavy lifting on this price. The Giants' record anchors the perception downward, but records are lagging indicators and pitching matchups are leading ones. At +120, we are paid to fade the story and buy the Statcast regression. EDGE ON: GIANTS ML (+120) I like the Giants |
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | BC +7.5 v. Winnipeg | Top | 35-19 | Win | 100 | 2 h 17 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON BC +7½ +100 Our Edge: The market opened BC +7.5 and has since corrected to as low as +5.5, leaving the posted +7.5 (+100) as a stale line sitting a full hook above the current key number of 7, and we are exploiting that price lag before it closes. Statistical Edges: Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic anchored to BC's 1-5 record and the headline of a rookie starter in his first CFL appearance. That story is easy to recall and easy to price; the underlying adjustment, Winnipeg also starting a backup and coughing up 52 points a week ago, is harder to summon and therefore under-weighted at the recreational books still posting +7.5. Layer in narrative bias around Winnipeg's perennial-contender halo, and you get a stale number that the sharper books have already repaired. Our framework takes the two points and the plus money before the correction finishes. EDGE ON: BC +7.5 (+100) I like the BC |
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | Sun v. Sky UNDER 178.5 | Top | 88-94 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 32 m | Show |
|
Sun/Sky: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 178½ Our Edge: The market is anchored to a small-ball, transition-scoring narrative and has posted 178.5 without properly discounting the offensive talent both rosters have lost. We are taking the Under against a peak number priced for a game these depleted rotations cannot sustain. Statistical Edges: That is a top-of-lineup gravity loss on both sides. The math to hit ~89 team points against any WNBA defense with that shot creation profile is stretched. That configuration inflates pace expectations but historically compresses half-court efficiency once fatigue sets in. Bayesian-updated shooting efficiency in these deep-fatigue profiles trends 3-5% below season baseline in second halves. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability cascade. The Sun surrendered 92 to Washington on Tuesday and Chicago's post-Diggins games have cleared totals, so the recent scoring outputs are easy to recall and the number climbed from a 171.5 open to 178.5. That cascade prices the defensive collapse story cleanly, then forgets to subtract Rickea Jackson's 18 PPG and Griner's interior possessions from the offensive side of the ledger. Recency bias is doing the pricing; the roster math is doing the work. EDGE ON: Under 178.5 (-110) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | Darleys Perez v. Damien Dibbell -250 | Top | 0-1 | Win | 100 | 2 h 48 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Damien Dibbell -250
|
|||||||
| 07-30-26 | ML Vitebsk +155 v. Sutjeska | Top | 2-1 | Win | 155 | 8 h 39 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON ML Vitebsk +155
|
|||||||
| 07-29-26 | Arthur Gea +160 v. Michael Zheng | Top | 2-1 | Win | 160 | 12 h 53 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Arthur Gea +160
|
|||||||
| 07-29-26 | Mariners v. Dodgers UNDER 9.5 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 14 h 25 m | Show | |
|
Mariners/Dodgers: BENNETT EDGE ON under 9½ Our Edge Statistical Edges That is a stable, not volatile, run profile. There is no atmospheric carry to convert warning-track contact into the extra run this total requires. Psychological Edges Ohtani, Freeman, and Betts are the most-recalled names in the sport, and 9.5 is priced as if their aggregate profile guarantees a five-plus run inning. My framework Bayesian-updates that prior against Hancock's actual 2026 suppression profile and Lauer's stable-if-mediocre floor, and the posterior lands well under nine. The market is paying for name recognition, not for a matchup where both starters have averaged over 5.2 IP with fewer than three earned in recent form. EDGE ON: Under 9.5 (-103) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 07-29-26 | America de Cali +150 v. Real Cartagena | Top | 1-1 | Loss | -100 | 5 h 57 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON America de Cali +150
|
|||||||
| 07-29-26 | Dream v. Wings OVER 180.5 | Top | 82-81 | Loss | -105 | 12 h 17 m | Show |
|
Dream/Wings: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 180½ Our Edge We are exploiting a market that has anchored the total to two low-scoring May meetings while ignoring a full-strength, post-All-Star break lineup refresh and a pace environment built to clear 180.5 comfortably. Statistical Edges • Pace: Atlanta runs at 98.05 possessions per 48, one of the highest marks in the WNBA over the last 10 games. Dallas at 95.53 is not slowing anyone down. Volume alone gets this number to the finish line. • Offensive Rating: Dallas posts a 113.6 offensive rating over the L10 with a 0.53 eFG% and 35% from three. That is a top-shelf offense playing at home off seven days rest. • Defensive Rating: Both defenses grade out at 108.2 (Atlanta) and 109.8 (Dallas). Neither team is generating stops, which is the exact signature of a game that plays over an inflated number. • Combined Scoring: Atlanta's 87.6 PPG and Dallas's 91.7 PPG sum to 179.3, sitting a shade under the line. That gap collapses once you adjust for the pace uptick against a 108.2 defense and the return of Brionna Jones to Atlanta's frontcourt rotation. Psychological Edges The market is trapped by recency bias tied to those two May Under results and by an availability heuristic around Angel Reese's knee scare. Both distort the base rate. Reese is on the expected starting five at 100% play probability, and the roster is healthier now than in either prior meeting. My framework Bayesian-updates the L10 pace and efficiency profile above two small-sample April/May games played under different rotations. The narrative says Under; the possession math and lineup data say the opposite. EDGE ON: Over 180.5 (-105) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 07-29-26 | Rangers v. Rays -130 | Top | 0-3 | Win | 100 | 11 h 16 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Rays -130 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has priced the Rangers' preseason roster reputation into a lineup that no longer exists, while over-weighting Rays starter Ian Seymour's ERA against a Texas offense stripped of its production core. Statistical Edges: The projected order runs Ezequiel Duran fifth and Nicky Lopez ninth, a bottom-third offensive profile forced into the middle of the card. Bayesian-updated run expectancy against this depleted Texas lineup skews further against him when Gore fails to complete five innings. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by a halo effect anchored to the Rangers' 2023 championship core, Seager and Jung specifically, whose names still carry pricing weight even when they aren't in the lineup. Add an availability bias around Gore's strikeout upside, the memorable 7-K outings crowd out the more frequent 5-inning, 5-run outings that define his actual distribution. Our framework updates on who is playing, not who the market remembers. The quantitative floor here is meaningfully above the implied -130 price. EDGE ON: RAYS ML (-130) I like the Rays |
|||||||
| 07-28-26 | Mariners +175 v. Dodgers | 7-6 | Win | 175 | 14 h 38 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Mariners +175
|
|||||||
| 07-28-26 | Liberty -4.5 v. Sparks | 113-109 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 33 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Liberty -4½ -110 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has anchored to New York's 1-8 ATS road-favorite label while underweighting the structural collapse of a Sparks offense missing its only 20+ point-per-game scorer. Statistical Edges: Strip her out and the true offensive rating is meaningfully lower. The next-highest scoring guard on the expected floor is Ariel Atkins at 9.2 ppg. That is a shot-creation void the Sparks have no roster-level solution for. Stewart plus Jones alone (both healthy, both 26 games in) is more nightly production than the Sparks' entire projected starting five outside of Ogwumike and Hamby. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the availability heuristic on that 1-8 ATS road-favorite line. That record is the easiest, loudest data point to recall, so it dominates the price. What the availability shortcut obscures is that the record was compiled across variable health states and opponent quality. The current input, a Plum-less Sparks with a -9.7 net rating, is a different distribution entirely. Bayesian-updated for the Plum absence and the intact Liberty core, the fair number is closer to a 6-point favorite. The public is paying for a narrative the underlying roster no longer supports. EDGE ON: LIBERTY -4.5 (-110) I like the Liberty |
|||||||
| 07-28-26 | Racing Club v. Rosario Central +143 | Top | 0-0 | Loss | -100 | 12 h 27 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Rosario Central +143
|
|||||||
| 07-28-26 | Blue Jays v. Nationals OVER 8.5 | Top | 6-8 | Win | 100 | 12 h 10 m | Show |
|
Blue Jays/Nationals: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 8½ Our Edge: The market is anchored to Shane Bieber's recent surface line, ignoring a Statcast profile that ranks among the worst in professional baseball for a rostered starter. Statistical Edges: His .267 BA sits against a .309 xBA, and his .365 wOBA against sits against a .399 xwOBA. The contact quality he is surrendering is elite-hitter territory. Boston on 6/30), but his floor is a 2.1 IP, 6-hit, 3-ER outing against Pittsburgh on 7/5. His 3.96 xERA vs. 3.58 ERA also indicates modest positive regression against him. Ball flight is materially longer than in April/September baselines. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped in a recency-bias loop on Bieber. Seven innings and one earned run against Tampa Bay on 7/23 is the available memory; a 7.26 xERA over 132 plate appearances is the base rate. Bayesian updating says one clean start should barely move a prior built on this much high-quality contact allowed. The name-brand halo effect is doing the rest of the work at 8.5. EDGE ON: Over 8.5 (-110) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 07-28-26 | Sun v. Mystics OVER 156.5 | Top | 84-92 | Win | 100 | 12 h 45 m | Show |
|
Sun/Mystics: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 156½ Our Edge: The market has anchored to Washington's season-long slow pace and Griner's absence, mispricing a matchup where Connecticut's defensive floor and both teams' recent scoring form point to a higher-tempo game than the 156.5 total implies. Statistical Edges: Road pace tends to regress toward the faster team's baseline, and 96+ pace environments blow past 156.5 at a materially higher rate than the market is pricing. That is not a defense capable of holding a peaking Washington offense under a league-average scoring line. Their 78.9 PPG in the L10 sample understates a recently unlocked ceiling. Fully rested legs correlate with better shooting variance and cleaner offensive execution, which lifts totals rather than compressing them. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic on Brittney Griner's absence. Her 14.1 PPG is the easy, salient number to subtract, and books have anchored the total to a Griner-less Sun offense. That anchoring ignores the base-rate reality: Connecticut's total ceiling is driven by pace and defensive porosity, not by their center's scoring. My framework Bayesian-updates against the narrative and lands on a modeled total north of 160. EDGE ON: Over 156.5 (-115) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 07-27-26 | Yankees v. White Sox +136 | Top | 9-5 | Loss | -100 | 12 h 18 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON White Sox +136 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Max Fried's 2.48 xERA and the Yankees' brand equity, and it is systematically discounting a New York lineup that has lost its three primary power sources. Statistical Edges: That is the entire heart of the order removed. The team behind them (59-46) is being priced as if the middle of the lineup is still intact. His prior four starts averaged under 5 innings. A 75-80 pitch cap converts this into a bullpen game before the sixth. The implied win probability of 42.4% understates a team already at a 52.9% actual clip. Munetaka Murakami is hitting second, off a 2-HR, 6-RBI game on July 26. Fried's .260 xSLG allowed matters far less if he is out after 80 pitches. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the halo effect. Fried's 2.48 xERA is elite, and the Yankees jersey carries residual brand premium, so the price gets built around a full-strength Fried-vs-Yankees archetype that no longer exists. The availability heuristic compounds it: Judge, Stanton, and Bellinger are the names bettors recall, so the lineup is priced from memory rather than from the actual card. Once Fried exits, this becomes a coin-flip bullpen game where +136 is significantly mispriced. EDGE ON: WHITE SOX ML (+136) I like the White Sox |
|||||||
| 07-27-26 | Kei Nishikori +155 v. Juncheng Shang | Top | 2-1 | Win | 155 | 4 h 28 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Kei Nishikori +155
|
|||||||
| 07-26-26 | Corinthians +240 v. Bahia | Top | 1-1 | Loss | -100 | 8 h 38 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Corinthians +240
|
|||||||
| 07-26-26 | Astros v. White Sox UNDER 9.5 | Top | 3-12 | Loss | -118 | 6 h 6 m | Show |
|
Astros/White Sox: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON under 9½ Our Edge: The market has priced this 9.5 total to Ronel Blanco's post-surgery volatility and a July heat narrative, but the underlying lineup composition on both sides tells a different story. Statistical Edges: The projected batting order is stacked with sub-.700 OPS profiles like Chase Meidroth, Drew Romo, and Tristan Peters hitting seven through nine, capping the offensive ceiling regardless of matchup. Three of his last five outings have gone for two earned or fewer. Elevated K-rates against a bottom-third contact lineup suppress the sequencing needed to clear 9.5. Without the outbound wind that actually drives Rate Field into a launching pad, the venue plays closer to neutral than the total suggests. Psychological Edges: The market is anchored to two vivid inputs: Blanco's 7.71 ERA and a Chicago-in-July heat narrative. That combination triggers an availability heuristic where recent, easy-to-recall data points crowd out the base rate. The base rate here is a depleted White Sox lineup facing a strikeout arm and a league-average starter in still air. The 9.5 is priced to the story, not the roster. EDGE ON: Under 9.5 (-118) I like the Under |
|||||||
| 07-26-26 | Astros v. White Sox -107 | 3-12 | Win | 100 | 6 h 45 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON White Sox -107 Our Edge: The market is anchoring to Ronel Blanco's pre-surgery reputation and an 8-strikeout debut line, pricing this game as a coin flip when the underlying pitching matchup and team form both tilt toward Chicago. Statistical Edges: That is not a small-sample fluke pointing up, it is a small-sample fluke pointing down. His stuff has not stabilized. Against a White Sox lineup featuring Munetaka Murakami (.897 OPS, 20 HR.521 SLG in 234 AB), that xSLG profile is a matchup problem, not a variance problem. In his last outing versus Texas he walked zero and struck out six. The floor is meaningfully higher than Blanco's. The home team is the better team on record, and the market is pricing them at -107. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic tied to Blanco's pre-injury identity and his headline 8-K debut. Recall is dominated by the strikeout column; the .605 xSLG and 6.76 xERA sitting one line below it get discounted. Bayesian updating on a pitcher two starts removed from a 14-month layoff should weight the contact-quality metrics heavily against the reputational prior, not the other way around. The line reflects the story, not the math. EDGE ON: WHITE SOX ML (-107) I like the White Sox |
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Team Weatherspoon v. Team Cooper OVER 276.5 | Top | 129-122 | Loss | -115 | 11 h 44 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 276½
|
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Toronto v. BC OVER 57.5 | Top | 26-12 | Loss | -120 | 130 h 23 m | Show |
|
Toronto/BC: TOP BENNETT EDGE ON over 57½ Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that is anchoring to a single backup-quarterback data point while ignoring the venue, pace, and prior-meeting scoring baseline that governs this specific matchup. Statistical Edges: Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic centered on Chase Brice's four-interception relief appearance on July 17. That single, vivid box score is doing disproportionate work in the pricing, crowding out the base rate established by the 62-point Week 1 meeting and the indoor venue. Recency bias compounds it: one 19-17 game becomes the mental template for a matchup that has otherwise scored above this number. Our framework Bayesian-updates the four-pick outing against a full week of first-team reps and a defense ranked near the bottom of the league in pass coverage. The prior baseline reasserts itself, and the -120 juice is a discount on a total the underlying inputs support. EDGE ON: Over 57.5 (-120) I like the Over |
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Yankees v. Phillies +110 | Top | 3-1 | Loss | -100 | 11 h 44 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Phillies +110 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that has anchored the Phillies' price to an unfamiliar starter's name while ignoring that Yankees lefty Ryan Weathers profiles as one of the most exploitable arms in this matchup at plus money. Statistical Edges: His underlying Statcast profile suggests negative regression, not stability. The volatility floor is a two-inning implosion. A Phillies 1-4 of Turner, Schwarber, Harper, and Bohm is well above that baseline against left-handed pitching. New York's run-scoring ceiling collapses without its two highest-leverage bats, and the replacements slot into a lineup that must manufacture rather than slug. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an availability heuristic tied to Yankees brand equity and the 58-45 record on the marquee. Bettors are pricing the pinstripes, not the personnel actually taking the field tonight. That same bias undervalues home teams whose listed starter is unfamiliar, because the ease of recalling a name overrides the base-rate reality that a healthy Phillies offense at Citizens Bank Park against a 4.55 xERA lefty is a coin-flip proposition at worst. At +110, we are being paid a premium to fade a narrative the underlying inputs no longer support. EDGE ON: PHILLIES ML (+110) I like the Phillies |
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Royals +165 v. Tigers | 3-2 | Win | 165 | 6 h 49 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Royals +165 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Detroit starter Casey Mize's 2.79 ERA and Kansas City's road record, ignoring that Mize was pulled after 3.1 innings in his last start and is returning from groin and wrist issues that cap his workload. Statistical Edges: His 2.79 ERA is inflated relative to a 3.14 xERA, and a short leash forces Detroit into middle relief by the fifth inning. His .239 BA against and .307 wOBA against outperform the surface ERA gap the market is pricing. Mize history: Salvador Perez is 14-for-33 (.424) career against Mize, a meaningful sample that concentrates lineup value in the cleanup spot precisely against the arm the price assumes will dominate. A restricted-workload starter facing a lineup with a documented crusher and a rookie (Jac Caglianone) on a 10-game hitting streak is not a 62% dog. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by the halo effect around Mize's headline ERA and an availability cascade fueled by Kansas City's 17-35 road record. Both signals are backward-looking. Bayesian updating on Mize's 58-pitch exit and the underlying xERA gap (his 3.14 vs. Wacha's 4.16 is far narrower than the 2.79 vs. 3.66 surface read suggests) collapses the price gap the book is charging. EDGE ON: ROYALS ML (+165) I like the Royals |
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Tyrell Fortune v. Rizvan Kuniev -275 | 0-1 | Win | 100 | 101 h 23 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Rizvan Kuniev -275
|
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Thomas Petersen +155 v. Valter Walker | 0-1 | Loss | -100 | 97 h 57 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Thomas Petersen +155
|
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | ADT v. Sport Boys -182 | Top | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 0 h 2 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Sport Boys -182
|
|||||||
| 07-25-26 | Mike Davis v. Nurullo Aliev -150 | Top | 0-1 | Win | 100 | 142 h 13 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Nurullo Aliev -150
|
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Jesse Hart v. Jose Martinez +135 | Top | 1-0 | Loss | -100 | 4 h 4 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Jose Martinez +135
|
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Calgary v. Winnipeg | Top | 52-30 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 17 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Winnipeg PK -110
|
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Guardians +125 v. Rays | 3-11 | Loss | -100 | 12 h 48 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Guardians +125 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Shane McClanahan's 3.16 ERA and the Rays' 35-15 home record, ignoring Statcast peripherals that grade Cleveland's starter as the more effective run-suppressor at plus money. Statistical Edges: Guardians starter Joey Cantillo sits at 3.74 ERA / 3.94 xERA, roughly fair-valued. The pitcher the market treats as the ace is allowing louder expected contact. Under the hood, Cleveland has the better arm on the mound tonight. Cantillo has posted a 5-start stretch with 36 strikeouts and just one outing above 2 earned runs allowed. Psychological Edges: This is a textbook halo effect priced into a starting pitcher. McClanahan's name equity as a former ace and the Rays' gaudy home record are doing the heavy lifting on this number, not the underlying batted-ball data. The market is using surface ERA as a shortcut and refusing to Bayesian-update on a full season of Statcast evidence that says Cantillo has been the more effective pitcher at limiting expected damage. When the anchor is a reputation and the counter-evidence is a full run of xERA overperformance, the plus-money side of the correction is where the value lives. We are buying the regression, not the narrative. EDGE ON: GUARDIANS ML (+125) I like the Guardians |
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Yankees v. Phillies -123 | Top | 1-0 | Loss | -123 | 11 h 23 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Phillies -123 Our Edge Statistical Edges Luzardo, a left-hander, neutralizes the top and middle of that order across the highest-leverage plate appearances. Bayesian-updated priors regress that ERA toward the expected figure, not the surface number the market is pricing. The underlying contact profile does not support the ERA the line is anchored to. Against a Yankees offense that has been playing without Aaron Judge (60-Day IL) and Giancarlo Stanton (10-Day IL), the run-production ceiling is capped. Psychological Edges Schlittler's 2.20 ERA and recent strikeout totals are the salient, easily recalled data points, and the price reflects that surface story. The 3.03 xERA, the platoon disadvantage against five left-handed bats, and the Judge-Stanton power vacuum are less vivid inputs that the anchored line has not fully absorbed. Availability bias rewards the clean number over the messy structural read, and the -123 is the size of that mispricing. EDGE ON: PHILLIES ML (-123) I like the Phillies |
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Lucas Glover -115 v. Stephan Jaeger | 70-70 | Push | 0 | 5 h 39 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Lucas Glover -115 Our Edge: We are exploiting a market that is pricing Lucas Glover's five-stroke leaderboard advantage as a coin flip because it is anchored to his volatile long-term putting profile, ignoring the schedule-adjusted iron play that is actually driving his ballstriking run. Statistical Edges: A five-shot cushion in a 36-hole head-to-head is not a coin flip regardless of what the baselines say. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped by an anchoring bias tied to Glover's -0.507 season SG:Putt. Because his career narrative includes well-known putting yips, any hot round with the flat stick gets flagged as unsustainable, and the price refuses to fully credit the five-stroke lead. That framing misses the actual signal. Glover's Round 1 was built through the bag: +0.43 off the tee, +3.10 on approach, +0.39 around the green. Bayesian-updated on two straight top-5s, the iron play is the base rate now, not the outlier. The market is paying for a putting story the ballstriking numbers have already overtaken. EDGE ON: Lucas Glover (-115) I like Lucas Glover |
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Max Homa v. Sungjae Im -110 | Top | 74-70 | Win | 100 | 6 h 35 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Sungjae Im -110 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Homa's TPC Twin Cities course history and name recognition, ignoring that Im's Round 1 tee-to-green profile was materially stronger and that his putting variance is a mean-reversion candidate, not a trend. Statistical Edges: Live): Im's -2.10 putting round is a 2.34-stroke outlier below his season baseline of +0.241, textbook regression fuel over 54 remaining holes. Psychological Edges: The market is trapped in an availability heuristic keyed to Homa's easily-recalled +1.68 SG:T2G career average at this venue and his recent runner-up at the John Deere. That memory is doing more pricing work than Round 1's actual shot data, which showed Homa's approach game bleeding -1.14 strokes on a course where five greens are guarded by water. Bayesian updating on the new information, Im striped it, Homa didn't, moves this line materially toward Im, yet the number sits at pick'em because the narrative anchor hasn't budged. We are buying the ball-striker whose only problem was a putter that historically doesn't stay this cold. EDGE ON: SUNGJAE IM ML (-110) I like Sungjae Im |
|||||||
| 07-24-26 | Roman Andres Burruchaga -105 v. Alexander Blockx | Top | 1-2 | Loss | -105 | 1 h 28 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Roman Andres Burruchaga -105
|
|||||||
| 07-23-26 | Mushuc Runa v. Emelec -117 | Top | 1-1 | Loss | -117 | 77 h 40 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Emelec -117
|
|||||||
| 07-23-26 | Royals v. Tigers -195 | Top | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 10 h 46 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON Tigers -195 Our Edge Statistical Edges That is one of the widest expected-to-actual spreads on the board, and Bayesian-updated priors force the mean reversion to start somewhere. His 62-PA sample is small, but every batted-ball input points to a pitcher living on borrowed contact luck. His last two starts produced 18 strikeouts across 11 innings, giving the profile a genuine whiff floor rather than pure BABIP fortune. Detroit is 27-23 at Comerica behind a lineup that is fully intact for this slate. Psychological Edges Recency bias on Dobnak's four-inning, one-run outing against San Diego crowds out the 5.60 xERA baseline the underlying data has been screaming for weeks. The public sees a 48-54 team laying -195 and flinches. Our framework sees a starter with elite expected metrics facing a decimated lineup whose true-talent run production has collapsed since the Witt IL placement. EDGE ON: TIGERS ML (-195) I like the Tigers |
|||||||
| 07-23-26 | Jesper Svensson v. John Parry -115 | Top | 65-69 | Loss | -115 | 4 h 52 m | Show |
|
TOP BENNETT EDGE ON John Parry -115 Our Edge Statistical Edges Historical winners at this venue have ranked 4th or better in SG: Approach during their winning week, which is the single most predictive input for the 3M Open. The overall efficiency edge belongs to the shorter hitter here. TPC Twin Cities features water in play on multiple holes and 4-inch primary rough, both of which penalize the miss more than they reward the extra 22 yards. At -115, the implied win rate on this H2H is roughly 53.5%; the underlying skill inputs project Parry as the clear favorite. Psychological Edges Svensson's recent top-10s at the RBC Canadian Open and Byron Nelson are easy to recall, and his +14.163 driving distance is the flashiest number on the comparison sheet. The market anchors to length because "bomb and gouge" is the modern narrative for tour golf. But the base rate at this specific course rewards precision iron play, not carry distance. Kitayama, Hodges, and Vegas all won here from off the FedExCup radar by controlling their irons. Parry's skill profile fits that template; Svensson's does not. EDGE ON: John Parry (-115) I like John Parry |
|||||||
| 07-23-26 | Christiaan Bezuidenhout -120 v. Michael Kim | 68-69 | Win | 100 | 2 h 39 m | Show | |
|
BENNETT EDGE ON Christiaan Bezuidenhout -120 Our Edge: The market is anchored to Michael Kim's superior OWGR and driving distance profile, ignoring that DataGolf's forward-looking model rates Bezuidenhout as the more efficient overall golfer on a course where short-game precision compounds over 72 holes. Statistical Edges: The predictive layer already favors our side at a price implying 54.5%. On a TPC Twin Cities layout with 78 bunkers and water on 13 holes, scrambling equity is the dominant bogey-avoidance lever. Small edge, but it compounds across a projected 4-round matchup. Higher floor on a matchup that requires four rounds to resolve. Psychological Edges: The market is paying for a halo effect around Kim's OWGR of 57. OWGR is a backward-looking two-year weighted metric that lags current form, while DataGolf's skill decomposition is Bayesian-updated and captures recent shot-level performance. Bettors also fall into an availability bias on driving distance: length is visible and easy to recall, while strokes gained around the green and putting are the quieter categories that actually separate this field. Our framework discounts the name-recognition premium and prices the matchup on what the underlying tee-to-green and short-game data actually says. EDGE ON: Christiaan Bezuidenhout (-120) I like Christiaan Bezuidenhout |
|||||||