Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-11-23 | Prairie View A&M v. Southern -5 | 65-79 | Win | 100 | 10 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Woods is 8-0 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points as the coach of SOUTHERN U. Woods is 15-2 ATS in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making 31% or less of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SOUTHERN U. CBB Favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SOUTHERN U) - good FT shooting team (69-73%) against an average FT shooting team (65-69%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (14.5 or less TO) after 15+ games are 40-12 ATS L/5 seasons for. a 77% conversion rate for bettors. Southern U to cover |
|||||||
02-11-23 | James Madison v. Coastal Carolina +6.5 | 73-66 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 47 m | Show | |
02-11-23 | Kansas v. Oklahoma +3.5 | 78-55 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma has lost 3 straight overall and 5 straight conference games and are in desperation mode . Considering how well they played overall in a close 4 point loss in Lawrence earlier this season I can see them being competitive once again. OKLAHOMA is 10-1 ATS as a home underdog of 6 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. OKLAHOMA is 6-0 ATS as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. KANSAS is 6-15 ATS versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 season. Play on Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
02-10-23 | Xavier -6.5 v. Butler | 67-69 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Xavier has revenge on board for being knocked out in the donkey round of last year’s Big East tourney, by a 89 -82 score and Im betting they come here spitting bullets. BUTLER is 2-11 ATS as an underdog this season. BUTLER is 4-11 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. Play on Xavier to cover |
|||||||
02-10-23 | VMI +10.5 v. East Tennessee State | 65-69 | Win | 100 | 11 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. E TENN ST is 0-8 ATS as a home favorite or pick this season. E TENN ST is 0-8 ATS in a home game where the total is 135 to 139.5 over the last 3 seasons. E TENN ST is 1-8 ATS in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (E TENN ST) - average defensive team (67-74 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG) after 15+ games, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are just 6-28 ATS L/27 seasons for a go against 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on VMI to cover |
|||||||
02-09-23 | Arizona v. California +19 | 85-62 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona took out California by 15 points at home last time out, and my projections estimate a similar diff here which gives us an almost 2 full possession value with taking points here. CALIFORNIA is 18-8 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. CALIFORNIA is 22-12 ATS after 2 straight games giving up 9 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. Fox is 18-8 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CALIFORNIA. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (ARIZONA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 6-33 L/5 seasons for a go against 86% conversion rate for bettors. |
|||||||
02-09-23 | UCLA v. Oregon State +15 | 62-47 | Push | 0 | 13 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA is 1-8 ATS in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons. UCLA is 3-12 ATS after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half over the last 2 seasons. Cronin is 4-13 ATS in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) after 15 or more games in all games he has coached since 1997. OREGON ST is 9-2 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) over the last 2 seasons.OREGON ST is 32-19 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (UCLA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 11-46 ATS L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate. Play on Oregon state to cover |
|||||||
02-09-23 | Middle Tennessee +1.5 v. Western Kentucky | 89-93 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MTSU has won three straight and seven of the last 11 matchups vs W. Kentucky and Im betting they turn the trick again. MIDDLE TENN ST is 11-3 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. MIDDLE TENN ST is 15-0 ATS after 2 straight games with 12 or less assists over the last 2 seasons.MIDDLE TENN ST is 8-1 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. Play on Midd Tennessee state to cover |
|||||||
02-08-23 | Creighton v. Seton Hall +4 | 75-62 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Seton Hall is out looking for revenge after an ugly 22 point blowout loss to the Blue Jays on the road earlier this season. Creighton is a fine team, but away from home seem average at best . Note: Since that loss the Pirates have won 7 of their L/8 overall are 8-3 at Prudential Center this season and their average margin of victory in Newark coming by 21.4 points per game. Im betting it will be Seton Halls top tier D, that is the difference maker tonight. Seton Hall has one of the top defenses in the country as it ranks 14th in KenPom's adjusted defensive efficiency and it tops the BIG EAST in scoring defense (64 ppg), field goal percentage defense (40.4 pct) and three-point field goal defense (29.4 pct). Seton Hall has played one of the most difficult schedules in the country as KenPom ranks the Pirates' slate as the 15th toughest in Division I and its NET SOS ranks 21st. Holloway is 20-6 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) in all games he has coached since 1997.Holloway is 39-21 ATS ) as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
02-07-23 | Toledo +2.5 v. Akron | 84-74 | Win | 100 | 14 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Toledo has won 10 of its last 13 meetings vs. Akron but dropped a 70-62 decision to the Zips in last year's MAC semifinals and now have some extra motivation with revenge on board . TOLEDO is 8-1 ATS in a road game where the total is 145 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons.TOLEDO is 11-3 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.TOLEDO is 11-3 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. Toledo to cover |
|||||||
02-07-23 | Rutgers +4.5 v. Indiana | 60-66 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Rutgers and Indiana will meet for the 16th time, with RU leading the series, . RU has ran its winning streak against the Hoosiers to six straight and eight of the past nine game and Im betting on a rinse and repeat situation here this evening. Pikiell is 13-3 ATS as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points in all games he has coached since1997. Its going to be Rutgers extremely strong defense that gets us the cover. Note:Rutgers has been moving upward this season thanks to an outstanding defense. The Scarlet Knights are 16-1 when holding its opponent to 65 or fewer points and 8-0 when doing so in Big Ten games. Rutgers has allowed 65 points or fewer in all but 3 games this year.Scarlet Knights are 9-1 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
02-06-23 | Idaho State +3.5 v. Northern Arizona | 75-70 | Win | 100 | 11 h 43 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After a heart breaking OT loss last time out, Im betting Idaho state will be out looking for quick redemption and who better to get it against other than a N.Arizona program they have defeated in their L/3 visits here. CBB underdog (IDAHO ST) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 consecutive road losses of 5 points or less are 103-59 ATS L/26 seasons for a 64% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Idaho State to cover |
|||||||
02-06-23 | Duke +4 v. Miami-FL | 59-81 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These teams have a recent history of playing closely contested games. Duke defeated Miami fl 68-66 earlier this season at home, and the three previous meetings have been decided by 4. 2, 2 points and Im betting on another. tight affair , with getting points being golden . It must also be noted that the Canes are off a hard fought win on the road vs Clemson last time out, and getting up and putting out the needed energy here as this game progresses may be a problem.MIAMI is 1-8 ATS in home games off a win against a conference rival over the last 2 seasons. Underdog is 4-0 ATS in the last 4 meetings. CBB Home teams where the opening line is +3 to -3 (MIAMI) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving 2 very good teams - outscoring opponents by 8+ PPG in the 2nd half of the season are 20-34 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Duke to cover |
|||||||
02-05-23 | Stanford v. Colorado -4.5 | 62-84 | Win | 100 | 10 h 32 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Colorado plays their very best hoops at home and are averaging 73.0 points , nearly eight points per game more than on the road (65.3 ppg). The Buffaloes have enjoyed a plus-12.4 scoring margin at home. Colorado is shooting 46.7 percent at home, compared to 40.4 percent in road games. The Buffaloes are holding opponents to 60.6 points on 40.6 percent from the field at home compared to 72.1 points and 45.7 percent in road contests. I know Stanford has won 5 straight, but all good and bad runs must come to end . The Buffaloes have won five straight and 15 of the last 17 over the Cardinal and as hosts here in Boulder have won the last eight. Rinse and repeat. Play on Colorado to win |
|||||||
02-05-23 | Houston -10.5 v. Temple | 81-65 | Win | 100 | 9 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Houston Cougars were home chalk vs Temple in their first meeting this season and lost by a 56-55 effort. It was a sleepy effort for a Cougars team that was considered one of the strongest in the nation. Now in redemption mode Im betting we really see the Cougars bring the heat here today in a what Im betting is a one way contest favoring the Cougars. Houston is 8-0 ATS on the road this season. Note: Temple when they lose SU at home vs a revenging opponent are 0-38-1 ATS. HOUSTON is 9-0 ATS in road games after a game where they made 78% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.HOUSTON in their L/ 58 games as a favorite of 10 or more points over the last 3 seasons have seen a average ppg diff click in at +22.6 ppg. Play on Houston to cover |
|||||||
02-05-23 | DePaul +11 v. Seton Hall | 64-69 | Win | 100 | 2 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SETON HALL is 1-8 ATS when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games over the last 3 seasons. Stubblefield is 14-2 ATS when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days as the coach of DEPAUL.DEPAUL is 6-0 ATS in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. DePaul to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Gonzaga +3.5 v. St. Mary's | 70-78 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This may not be one of Gonzaga's best teams, but they are still explosive offensively eclipsing the 100 point plateau 6 times this season behind one of College Hoops top players, Drew Timme. They must not be underestimated, vs a strong Saint Marys side, that is coming off a grueling game against USF last time out that seen them win late with a hard to believe shot. This is a huge letdown situation for the Gaels at an inopportune time. Few is 51-37 ATS as an underdog as the coach of GONZAGA with the average ppg diff clicking in at -2.9. Advantage Gonzaga . ST MARYS-CA is 17-35 ATS L/52 when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) after 15 or more games. Play on Gonzaga to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Stony Brook +15 v. Hofstra | 58-79 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hofstra is lazy around the rim and are often outworked which is not a good omen against a side like Stoney Brook who are exact opposite around the basket with the height to get the job done. Im betting on the visitors to smash and grab their way to a cover on a bloated line. Play on Stoney Brook to cover |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Miami-FL v. Clemson -1.5 | 78-74 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Home court advantage will be Im betting the decisive edge between two evenly matched sides.Clemson owns. a perfect 12-0 100% record this season at Littlejohn Coliseum. Meanwhile, Miami is 0-12 SU playing in this venue since becoming an ACC member. CLEMSON is 13-2 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +5.4 ppg.CLEMSON is 12-3 ATS at home when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +3.6 . Clemson to win |
|||||||
02-04-23 | Kansas v. Iowa State +2 | 53-68 | Win | 100 | 4 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Kansas barley got by Iowa State at home in their first meeting this season 62-60 , but will now be hard pressed to get a cover here on the road vs a Iowa State program that is 5-0 ATS L/5 opportunities with same season revenge from a loss of 20 points or less. Also Kansas has played a tiring schedule of late against top tier opposition and now could easily find the grind very rough vs a tenaciously physical Iowa State side that has won the rebound battle in 8 straight tilts. Iowa State is a perfect 12-0 this season at the Hilton Coliseum and Im betting will hit lucky 13 here today vs the visiting Jayahwks. IOWA ST is 13-5 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better) over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +2.3 . Play on Iowa State to cover |
|||||||
02-03-23 | Air Force +11.5 v. Nevada | 52-72 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Nevada because of a perfect 11-0 home record are being over priced here according to my own projections that make this line closer -9 for the home side, thus giving us a full possession advantage taking points. Nevada beat air force by 6 on the road earlier this season, but it must be noted that AIR FORCE is 10-3 ATS revenging a loss vs opponent this season. Scott is 41-24 ATS as a road underdog of 10 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Air Force to cover |
|||||||
02-03-23 | Kent State +2.5 v. Akron | 55-67 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Zips took the 2022 MAC Championship defeating Kent State 75-55 at Rocket Mortgage center. Now its redemption time for Kent State . I know Akron is undefeated at home this season, but Kent State snapped Akron's 30-game home-court winning streak at the JAR and swept the regular season series last season and are capable of pulling an upset tonight. KENT ST is 6-0 ATS as a road underdog of 3 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons.KENT ST is 6-0 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game this seasonKENT ST is 9-0 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 season. KENT ST is 10-1 ATSversus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.KENT ST is 9-1 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season. Play on Kent State to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Lamar v. McNeese State -8 | 70-63 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MCNeese to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | Kennesaw State -3 v. Bellarmine | 90-84 | Win | 100 | 10 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. KENNESAW ST is 6-0 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. BELLARMINE is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making 37% or more of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. Kennesaw State to cover |
|||||||
02-02-23 | NC-Greensboro v. Mercer +3.5 | 69-49 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. These two teams met in Greensboro on January 21 where UNCG narrowly edged Mercer in a defensive battle.UNCG and Mercer are the best defensive teams in the conference currently, allowing only 63.5 PPG and 68.3 PPG, respectively. Im betting on another close contested tilt with home court advantage being the difference maker and a prime cover opportunity for the host getting points. Mercer has won 7 of 11 home games vs Greensboro. Jones is 7-20 ATS as a favorite as the coach of UNC-GREENSBORO. CBB Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MERCER) - off 2 straight wins against conference rivals against opponent off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points are 26-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 84% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Mercer to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Army v. Lehigh -1.5 | 71-69 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Army defeated the Lehigh Mountain Hawks 80-78 in their last meeting on Dec. 30. Lehigh has however claimed the last two meetings inside Stabler Arena, the recent one coming in the Patriot League Quarterfinal where the Mountain Hawks came out on top, 91-77. Im betting on Lehigh getting revenge here tonight and to notch their 10th straight win overall. CBB underdog (ARMY) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games are 4-26 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Tennessee v. Florida +5.5 | 54-67 | Win | 100 | 10 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Florida Gators, despite of a 64-50 loss at fifth-ranked Kansas State in SEC/Big12 competition , have won five of six in league play and deserve respect here at home vs Tennessee.Florida has held 11 of its previous 13 opponents to under 40-percent shooting, including seven of its eight SEC opponents and Im betting it will once again be their defense that keeps them competitive against this top tier Vols program. FLORIDA is 7-0 ATS after scoring 55 points or less over the last 2 seasons. TENNESSEE is 0-6 ATS in road games after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. Play on Florida to cover |
|||||||
02-01-23 | Albany +14 v. UMass Lowell | 50-66 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Albany despite of a sub par record matches up well against Umass -Lowell beating tem January at home by a 89-63 count. I know revenge is now on board for the home side , but it must be noted UMASS-LOWELL is 0-7 ATS revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -6.7. ALBANY is 34-16 ATS in road games against conference opponents.ALBANY is 19-6 ATS in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 4+ per game. CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (UMASS-LOWELL) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less are 8-34 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 81% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Albany to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Fresno State +4.5 v. Wyoming | 62-85 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Fresno State is second in the MW in scoring defense in conference play (65.22 points allowed per MW game) Im betting it will be the Bulldogs D, that makes life difficult for the Wyoming Cowboys. Also in a game that the linesmkaers have pegged to be closely contested Fresno State top tier charity stripe shooting will give them a needed edge. Bulldogs enter this tilt having made 73.7 percent of its free throws (205-278), which has a chance to track down the school record for single-season free throw percentage (74.2 percent, 484-652, 1991-92). WYOMING is 0-6 ATS versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game this season. Fresno State defeated Wyoming 58-53 in both teams' MW opener back on Dec. 28 at the Save Mart Center- Wyoming's L/11 revenge opportunities have seen an average 1.1 ppg diff. Four of the last five games in the series have been decided by five points or fewer. Play on Fresno State to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Kansas State v. Kansas -6.5 | 78-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Revenge and redemption on board for Kansas tonight at home after a 83-82 loss on the road earlier this season in these rivals only meeting. The Kansas Jayhawks are 4-0 SU/ATS L/4 opportunities when seeking same-season revenge against the Kansas State, with every victory coming by by double-digit margins.Self is 26-12 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent as the coach of KANSAS with the average ppg margin clicking in just around under 10 ppg. Kansas is No. 8 in the NET Rankings through games played on Jan. 29. Kansas is No. 1 in NET Strength of Schedule and its eight Quadrant 1 wins are the most in NCAA Division I. Play on Kansas to cover |
|||||||
01-31-23 | Akron -2 v. Buffalo | 81-64 | Win | 100 | 10 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. AKRON is 8-1 ATS versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. Whitesell is 1-10 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. Akron to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Jackson State v. Southern -8 | 62-73 | Win | 100 | 14 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Southern matches up very well here at home vs visiting Jackson State. This season Southern is 6-0 vs common opponents winning by an average of 11.7 ppg. My projections are estimating a DD win for the hosts, giving us a viable edge on this line offering. Woods is 12-0 ATS n home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 45% or worse after 15+ games as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking at +19. Woods is 10-0 ATS in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SOUTHERN U which was the case last time out with the average ppg diff clicking in at +17.5/ Woods is 9-1 ATS in a home game where the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of SOUTHERN U with the average ppg diff clicking in at +21.1 . Play on Southern to cover |
|||||||
01-30-23 | Iowa State v. Texas Tech +1.5 | 77-80 | Win | 100 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tech's 34-point loss in Ames is its biggest margin of defeat this season and came after the Red Raiders beat ISU by 31 (72-41) in the Big 12 Championship quarterfinals last season. Iowa State got their revenge, but now its payback time for the Raiders in the rematch. Quote:"We've got payback on Monday," Obanor said. "It's the second half of Big 12 and it starts over. It's an 18-round fight and is truly exciting to see what we can do and what we can become. February is when players become players. The season is not over and I'm excited to show the world who we are and what we can become." End Quote. Tech had a 29-game home winning streak end with its first Big 12 home game this season after going 8-0 at home in non-conference play…. Its a prime opportunity to end a 4 game home losing streak here tonight vs a side that has lost 5 of 9 road games this season and in a look ahead situation to playing Kanas in their next tilt. Note: Iowa State is 3-22 SU L/25 away prior to facing Jayhawks. IOWA ST is 20-39 ATS L/59 on the road when the line is +3 to -3 . CBB home team (TEXAS TECH) - good free throw shooting team (69-73%) against an average free throw shooting team (65-69%), after a game where a team made 50% of their 3 point shots or better are 92-54 ATS L/5 seasons for a 63% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Texas Tech to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Detroit v. Youngstown State -8.5 | 63-73 | Win | 100 | 5 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Youngstown State led the nation as the highest team offensive efficiency rating, per teamrankings.com. The Penguins ranked first with 1.145 points per possession. Over the last three games. The offensive efficiency of Youngstown State was 1.150 points per possession and its obvious to me that they matchup very well against a Jesuit group that is 0-6 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.2. This is Detroit Mercy's 2nd road game in 3 nights and fatigue could easily set in here this tilt progresses. CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (DETROIT) - an good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 85 points or more are 19-52 L/5 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -11.1 ppg. Play on Youngstown State to cover |
|||||||
01-29-23 | Michigan State +8 v. Purdue | 61-77 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan State has won nine of its last 12 games and enters the game on Sunday with a 14-7 overall record, including a 6-4 mark in Big Ten play and must not be underestimated in their ability to compete here this afternoon vs streaking Purdue. The Spartans, have played one of the nation's toughest schedules to open the season, having faced the No. 1 toughest slate of opposing offenses in the country, the 19th-toughest slate of opposing defenses and rank No. 3 overall in strength of schedule. They are battle tested and get my backing to cover . MSU is 3rd in the B1G in scoring defense (64.10 ppg), 2nd in FG% defense (41.3%) and 1st in 3-point defense (28.5%).Tom Izzo is 28-22 in his career against Purdue.Spartans are 7-3 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. PURDUE is 4-12 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. Purdue is 0-6 ATS in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. Boilermakers are 1-6-1 ATS in their last 8 home games. Boilermakers are 1-9-2 ATS in their last 12 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400. CBB Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (MICHIGAN ST) - revenging a home loss vs opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive close wins by 5 or less over a conference rival are 79-39 ATS L/26 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Utah v. Oregon -4 | 56-68 | Win | 100 | 10 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oregon matches up very well vs Utah and beat them by 10 points on the road a few weeks ago and have are 22-2 SU overall record against Utah under Coach Altman including winning 10 in a row against Utah. I know Oregon despite of alot top tier talent does not always play up to expectations, but are more than capable of a big game here vs the Utes at home. UTAH is 0-6 ATS in road games revenging a home loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.UTAH is also 2-9 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (UTAH) - revenging a home loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, with 2 more starters returning from last year than opponent are 279-399 L/26 seasons for a go against 59% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Oregon to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Chattanooga +3 v. East Tennessee State | 73-64 | Win | 100 | 8 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. E TENN ST is 0-9 ATS in home lined games this season.E TENN ST is 0-7 ATS as a home favorite or pick this season. E TENN ST is 0-6 ATS in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game this season. UT-CHATTANOOGA is 7-0 ATS after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. Play on Chattanooga to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Northern Colorado +2 v. Northern Arizona | 73-83 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Arizona has lost 9 of their L/10 with their lone victory coming by 1 point, and they are a sub 500 side. I know N.Colorado may not inspire bettors either, but according to my power rankings matchup well here overall, and have won 2 of their L/3 games, while showing passing discipline. N COLORADO is 10-0 ATS after a game committing 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. .N ARIZONA is 1-9 ATS as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.N ARIZONA is 1-8 ATS in home games when playing against a sub par team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. Play on N.Colorado to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Illinois -1.5 v. Wisconsin | 61-51 | Win | 100 | 6 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Illinois has won five in a row over Wisconsin and Im betting on the 6th in a row comes here today.
Illinois has won its last two road game by an average margin of 22.0 points. Illinois leads all Big Ten teams with 22 road wins in league play over the last four years and are more than capable of turning the trick here again in this key Big 10 showdown. In its five Big Ten wins, Illinois is averaging 75.4 points while holding opponents to 61.0 points. Underwood is 6-0 ATS in road games versus sub par foul drawing teams - attempting 15 or less free throws/game as the coach of ILLINOIS. Play on Illinois to cover |
|||||||
01-28-23 | Alabama v. Oklahoma +6.5 | 69-93 | Win | 100 | 6 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma has lost 3 straight and have struggled in Big 12 competition against some of the best teams in the nation, while Alabama is streaking the other way winning 9 straight tilts . But from a matchup perspective the Sooners have the capabilities to slow Alabama down and to use the crowed noise to their advantage. The Sooners have nine players on the roster average 10 minutes or more so their depth will help them. Oklahoma is about the same offensively and defensively nationally in efficiency per 100 possessions. I know Sooners dont look remarkable, while the Tide have opened eyes with their fast paced take no prisoners style, but like I said the Sooners can compete. Oklahoma plays at about the same pace as Mississippi state which Alabama barley got by last time out with a late 3 pointer. ALABAMA is 1-9 ATS L/10 after 8 or more consecutive wins since 1997. OKLAHOMA is 9-1 ATS as a home underdog or pick over the last 3 seasons. OKLAHOMA is 13-3 ATS L/16 in home games against SEC opponents. ALABAMA is 4-16 ATS L/20 in road games against Big 12 conference opponents. Oklahoma is 3-0 SU/ATS L/3 at home in this series. Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
01-27-23 | Detroit +1 v. Robert Morris | 77-85 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This will be just the seventh all time meeting between the two schools as the Titans are 6-0 all-time, 5-0 since the Colonials joined the Horizon League including a 87-75 win at home this season . Im now betting behind the nations top scorer at 26.4 points per game, graduate senior (Antoine Davis) will be the difference maker for the road side.The Titans have shot over 50.0% as a team in each of the last five meetings against Robert Morris posting 50.8%, 50.9% and 55.6% in 2021, 50.9% last year and 52.7% in the match-up two weeks ago. Rinse and repeat on the agenda. ROBERT MORRIS is 1-8 ATS as a home favorite of 6 points or less or pick over the last 3 seasons. Play on Detroit Mercy to cover |
|||||||
01-27-23 | Manhattan v. Niagara -5.5 | 62-68 | Win | 100 | 11 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Niagara was upset by Manhattan as road favs back on Jan 8th and will now be in revenge and redemption mode and ready for payback on their own home floor tonight. NIAGARA is 6-0 ATS in home games revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +15.3 ppg. Niagara has momentum after a win last time out, - beating St.Peters by a 59-57 count - NIAGARA is 6-0 ATS after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons with a average ppg diff clicking in at +13 ppg. Play on Niagara to cover |
|||||||
01-26-23 | Arizona -5.5 v. Washington State | 63-58 | Loss | -105 | 15 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona has revenge on board for a embarrassing loss to Washington State at home 74-61 earlier in league play this season as 12 plus point chalk. Now with redemption at hand you can bet the Wildcats will be wide awake in the rematch and ready to lay down a beating of mammoth proportions. Arizona is 9-1 ATS L/10 at Wash State, and Im betting on another cover this evening by the powerful visitors. It must also be noted that the Cougars are off a another tepid offensive showing last time out and Im expecting more output issues against this type of shut down D.WASHINGTON ST is 0-8 ATS in home games after scoring 60 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The Cougars have averaged 63.1 ppg in their L/5 games and that just wont get the job done tonight against a side that will be flying in transition. Play on Arizona to cover |
|||||||
01-26-23 | SIU-Edwardsville v. Tennessee Tech +2 | 68-80 | Win | 100 | 12 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. SIUE comes into this road matchup following back-to-back home defeats last weekend.. The Cougars dropped a 67-58 decision to Morehead State last Thursday before falling to Southern Indiana in an 82-72 contest on Saturday and lack momentum at a critical time vs a Tennessee Tech side that has revenge on board for a earlier loss this season to SIUE on the road. Tenn Tech has won 5 of their L/6 overall, and have owned this series at home winning 6 of the L/7 matchups.Im betting home court advantage prevails in a cover opportunity. SIU EDWARDSVL is 0-6 ATS when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons. CBB team (SIU EDWARDSVL) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or more ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 6-23 L/5 seasons for. go against 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Tennessee Tech to cover |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Texas A&M v. Auburn -4 | 79-63 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Auburn’s 28-game home win streak is the longest in the nation and Im betting it continues tonight against Texas A&M as the home side has revenge for a loss they suffered in the SEC tourney last season. Note: Auburn has cashed 8 of their L/9 ATS revenge scenarios from a SEC tourney defeat. Tigers beat Texas A&M at home last season 75-58 . AUBURN is 9-2 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Play on Auburn to cover |
|||||||
01-25-23 | Lehigh -2 v. Holy Cross | 74-68 | Win | 100 | 12 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Lehigh has won 6 straight games and enter this tilt with momentum. According to my power rankings the Mountain Hawks matchup well here. The Mountain Hawks claimed the first meeting inside Stabler Arena on Jan. 11 (76-58) and are a viable short fav to earn the season sweep of the Crusaders.Lehigh had won four straight matchups before falling to the Crusaders last year in the Hart Center on Jan. 28, 2022 (67-65) to split the season series a year ago.LEHIGH is 7-1 ATS against conference opponents this season.LEHIGH is 7-0 ATS versus teams who average 33 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+games over the last 2 seasons.LEHIGH is 6-0 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Georgia Tech +11 v. Clemson | 51-72 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned The last three meetings between Tech and Clemson at Littlejohn Coliseum have been decided by a total of eight points. The game-winning winning points were scored with 15, 1 and 14 seconds on the clock, respectively. Mark Twain once said that “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhymes. Note:Tech leads the ACC in three-point defense, allowing 29.2 percent from distance this season in all games and Im betting it is this that will help them stay within the number tonight. GTech to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Kent State v. Northern Illinois +14 | 76-86 | Win | 100 | 15 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.
CBB road team (KENT ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or more ) playing a team with a losing record are just 6-33 L/5 seasons for a go against 84% conversion rate for bettors. Northern Illinois to cover |
|||||||
01-24-23 | Eastern Michigan +19.5 v. Toledo | 79-84 | Win | 100 | 14 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Eastern Michigan has found great success from the free throw line this year with the Eagles converting 74.3 percent, which ranks fourth in the MAC. Through 19 games played (Jan. 21), the Eagles have made their way to the charity stripe 20+ times in 10 games, including in five of the last six games, in which Eastern is converting at 75.6 percent clip. This will be a key component for us to get the cover tonight.
Eastern Michigan to cover |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Norfolk State v. Morgan State +4.5 | 71-77 | Win | 100 | 9 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Morgan State had a 6 game win streak end abruptly end last time out in DD, beatdown vs Howard on the road. However, now here t home in a big game against conference front runner Norfolk State Im expecting a big bounce back and competitive tilt from the Bears. Note: Morgan has started the 2022-23 season 7-0 at home and now have 10 consecutive victories at the Hill Field House. Jones is 1-9 ATS in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NORFOLK ST. ( The Bears are No. 3 in the MEAC shooting 47.1 percent from the field and No. 2 from beyond the arc (.376).) Play on Morgan St to cover |
|||||||
01-23-23 | Duke +3 v. Virginia Tech | 75-78 | Push | 0 | 10 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned Coach K’ is no long er at the helm of this top tier Duke program but the team is still viable and must not be underestimated as dogs with revenge on board for a regular season 15-point beatdown they took VTech last season in the beloved coaches farewell campaign. Now with redemption on hand look for the Blue Devils to get the job done in revenge mode vs a Hokies side that has lost 7 straight games. Young is 4-15 ATS after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of VIRGINIA TECH. Duke has held 17 of the 19 opponents to below their season scoring average and is 14-3 in those games. Seven scored their then-season low for points, including holding Iowa to a then-season-low 62, Xavier to 64 (20 points below its average) and Miami to a season-low tying 66 (12 off its scoring average).Duke's strong defensive numbers come against a schedule rated 24th-toughest versus opponent offenses . Defense Im betting gets us the cover. Young is 3-14 ATS (-12.4 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less after 15+ games as the coach of VIRGINIA TECH. VIRGINIA TECH is 0-9 ATS off a road loss against a conference rival over the last 2 season. VIRGINIA TECH is 0-7 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. VIRGINIA TECH is 1-11 ATS versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game this season. DUKE in 8 tilts against conference opponents this season have seen aggregate scores that are essentially even at 70 points each. Play on Duke to cover |
|||||||
01-22-23 | Wichita State +2 v. SMU | 71-69 | Win | 100 | 6 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Shockers have won five straight in this series have won all three AAC era visits to Moody. Note: WSU had held 12 of its first 17 opponents under 40% shooting (.372 collectively). Against a SMU side that owns 39.1% FG conversion rate over their L/5 the Shockers have an edge.
WICHITA ST is 10-0 ATS in a road game where the total is 130 to 134.5 over the last 3 seasons Play on Wichita State to cover . |
|||||||
01-22-23 | NJIT v. Vermont -12 | 69-85 | Win | 100 | 4 h 6 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Catamounts have won by an average margin of 14.7 points per game in their three conference victories and have held opponents to a 38.8% field goal percentage, and 25.4% three-point percentage.The Cats are 4-1 at home, and have outscored opponents by 14.4 points per game at Patrick Gym.Vermont earned victories in all three games against NJIT last season, including a 98-59 victory in the 2022 America East Quarterfinals. Key players tonight , Aaron Deloney averaged 13.7 points per game and a 63.6% three-point percentage against Tech last seasons, and he will be key what Im betting will be another conclusive victory in this series. VERMONT is 10-2 ATS in home games when playing against a struggling team (Win Pct. 20% to 40%) after 15 or more games with the average ppg diff clicking in at +15.4 ppg. Play on Vermont to cover |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Gonzaga v. Pacific +18.5 | 99-90 | Win | 100 | 2 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Pacific to cover (LATE STEAM) |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Texas A&M Corpus Christi v. Houston Christian +9 | 78-90 | Win | 100 | 12 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB team (TEXAS A&M CC) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or better ) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 6-22 L/5 seasons for a go against 79% conversion rate for bettors. Houston Christian to cover |
|||||||
01-21-23 | UCLA +1.5 v. Arizona | 52-58 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA is an explosive side and deserve respect here vs Arizona . The Bruins are unbeaten in conference play with an 8-0 record and are in revenge mode for a loss they suffered to the Wildcats in last years PAC 12 tournament. Note:0-9 SU S at home in this series when UCLA is in revenge mode and Im betting that trend stays alive when the final buzzer goes off this afternoon. Play on UCLA to cover |
|||||||
01-21-23 | Jacksonville State v. Stetson -5.5 | 81-87 | Win | 100 | 6 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (STETSON) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 71-5 L/5 seasons for a 94% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at +10.9 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Stetson |
|||||||
01-21-23 | TCU +7.5 v. Kansas | 83-60 | Win | 100 | 5 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Both these sides are off losses. Kansas lost to Kansas state and TCU who previously beat Kansas State lost on a letdown effort vs West Virginia . Both will be primed for a bounce back. TCU is being under rate here while Kansas despite of big time winning record have taken part in a lot of close affairs lately are looking mortal.
CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (KANSAS) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against a good defensive team (63-67 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less RE 15-36 ATS L/5 SEASONS for a go against 71% conversion rate. Play on TCU |
|||||||
01-21-23 | College of Charleston v. Northeastern +9.5 | 87-61 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Kelsey is 2-10 ATS L/12 after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more in all games he has coached . Coen is 16-6 ATS versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NORTHEASTERN. CBB road team (COLL OF CHARLESTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 5-32 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against for a 87% go against conversion rate. Play on Northeastern to cover |
|||||||
01-20-23 | Boise State +2 v. New Mexico | 79-81 | Push | 0 | 14 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Boise State is currently the top hoops program in the Mountain West at both ends of the floor and Im betting nothing changes tonight. I know New Mexico has played some top level ball of late, and have a signature win vs San Diego State , but it was Aztecs foul troubles that doomed them in that tilt and help New Mexico get the win. Here tonight against the disciplined Broncos they wont have that advantage. Broncos are 22-7-1 ATS in their last 30 road games vs. a team with a winning home record. Broncos are 20-7-1 ATS in their last 28 road games vs. a team with a home winning % of greater than .600. Lobos are 3-9 ATS in their last 12 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of greater than .600. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (BOISE ST) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 32-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate. Play on Boise State to cover |
|||||||
01-20-23 | Villanova v. St. John's -4 | 57-49 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This game has important implications for Big East Tournament seeding and NCAA tournament placement. The advantage however, goes to St.Johns as hosts playing a uptempo pace, creating a chaotic situation for most teams, and that will be especially evident vs a side like the Wildcats who continually looked flustered on D, allowing open shot after open shot. Note: The /Storm have covered 71% of their L/17 games as hosts in this series vs Villanova ... Add in revenge for a loss on the road to Villanova earlier this season, and you have a viable opportunity to lay points and cash a ticket. CBB team (ST JOHNS) - revenging a same season loss vs opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog of 12 points or more are 108-59 ATS L/26 seasons for a 65% conversion rate. Play on St.Johns to cover |
|||||||
01-19-23 | Florida Atlantic v. Texas-San Antonio +16.5 | 83-64 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FL Atlantic is on a roll but this according to my projections is just to many points to lay with them on the road vs a UTSA side that has a buy low sign written all over them. FLA ATLANTIC is 14-28 ATS L/42 in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 4+ points/game. TX-SAN ANTONIO is 27-13 ATS L/40 in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. TX-SAN ANTONIO is 9-0 ATS after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (FLA ATLANTIC) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (>=80%) playing a team with a losing record are 4-33 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play on UTSA to cover |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Furman v. Chattanooga | 77-69 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UTC ranks 26th in NCAA DI with a 38.3% three-point FG percentage and this will be key to getting by an explosive Furman offense.Entering NCAA DI action on Tuesday (1/17), Chattanooga ranks No. 1 in NCAA Division I behind an 11.9 three-pointers per game average.
CBB team (FURMAN) - excellent FT shooting team (73% or better) against a good FT shooting team (69-73%) after 15+ games, after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent are 5-23 L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. Chattanooga to cover/win |
|||||||
01-18-23 | Connecticut v. Seton Hall +5.5 | 66-67 | Win | 100 | 8 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. After a fast start to their campaign Connecticut is finally fallen back down to earth. Im betting the decent continues tonight vs revenge minded and under rated Seton Hall that lost to the Huskies in last seasons big East tourney. If Uconn do win it wont come easily. CONNECTICUT is 1-9 ATS in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. CONNECTICUT is 3-15 ATS after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. Holloway is 10-2 AT versus good shooting teams - making >=45% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Seton Hall to cover |
|||||||
01-17-23 | UNLV v. Utah State -5.5 | 71-75 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned UNLV has struggled defensively in conference play so far, allowing 75,76,77, 84, and 82 points losing all 4 of 5 games so far, and now take on a home side Utah State that has scored at least 80 points in 10 of its 18 games, including a season-high 106 points against Westminster. Utah State is 31-9 under Odom when scoring at least 70 points and is a perfect 22-0 under Odom when scoring at least 80 points. My projections estimate a close to 80 point output by the Aggies and a DD win and cover. The L/3 meetings in this series have seen Utah State decisively win by scores of 90-75, 74-53, both at home and 83-74. Rinse and repeat on board for tonight. UTAH ST is 11-4 ATS as a favorite this season with the average ppg diff clicking in at +11.3 ppg. Utah state to cover |
|||||||
01-17-23 | Kent State v. Eastern Michigan +14.5 | 77-63 | Win | 100 | 11 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In the last four games, the Eagles are averaging 20 trips to the free throw line and are converting at an 80.0 percent clip. For the year, EMU is hitting at 76.7 clip, which ranks second in the MAC and 14th nationally. The Eagles ability to get to the charity stripe Im betting gives us an edge on covering this number with the home dog.
CBB road team (KENT ST) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 9-36 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. |
|||||||
01-16-23 | Purdue v. Michigan State +3.5 | 64-63 | Win | 100 | 5 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Michigan State lost to Purdue in the semifinals of the Big Ten tourney last season and Tom Izzo and company have this game circled on their calendar for a while now and will be primed for payback on their home court. Michigan State has won seven of its last eight games and enters the game on Monday with a 12-5 overall record, including a 4-2 mark in Big Ten play and will not easily fold here. PURDUE is 11-22 ATS versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. Play on Michigan State to cover |
|||||||
01-15-23 | Ohio State v. Rutgers -3 | 64-68 | Win | 100 | 7 h 59 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State has lost 3 straight and playing in the difficult road environment Im betting will not see them stop the bleeding. After suffering a rare home loss to Iowa last time out Im expecting the Scarlet Knights to come out here with a top tier effort and get us the cover. RUTGERS is 11-0 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or more of their shots over the last 2 seasons. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
01-15-23 | St. John's +14.5 v. Connecticut | 85-74 | Win | 100 | 5 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Connecticut started strong this season with a 14-0 run but are just 4-3 in conference play . Meanwhile, St.Johns just ended a losing string with a win vs Butler last time out. Both sides need a win badly and Im betting that this will be a rock fight and hard fought battle. The Johnnies have had done well vs UConn lately cashing at a 6-0-1 ATS rate in their L/7 meetings and Im betting on a rinse repeat situation today.ST JOHNS is 9-2 ATSin road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or more of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.ST JOHNS is 6-0 ATS in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.CONNECTICUT is 3-14 ATS after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.Hurley is 5-16 ATS after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. Play on St.Johns to cover |
|||||||
01-14-23 | Chattanooga +2.5 v. Samford | 74-75 | Win | 100 | 21 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (UT-CHATTANOOGA) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or more ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5% or better ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 32-5 ATS L/23 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors. Chattanooga to cover |
|||||||
01-14-23 | North Dakota +5.5 v. Denver | 71-78 | Loss | -110 | 18 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. DENVER is 0-6 ATS against conference opponents this season. CBB underdog (N DAKOTA) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (65-69%), cold shooting team - 4 straight games making 40% or less of their shots are 32-8 L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. N Dakota State to cover |
|||||||
01-14-23 | Maine +8.5 v. Maryland-Baltimore County | 77-85 | Win | 100 | 10 h 31 m | Show | |
01-14-23 | Kentucky +12 v. Tennessee | 63-56 | Win | 100 | 15 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Wildcats had a 28 game home win streak smashed by South Carolina recently and you can bet Calipari will be primed for a bounce back vs a top tier side ( Tennessee) here in his own diggs. Add to that revenge for last years tourney loss and Im betting we see the Wildcats make a game of this this. Calipari is 31-16 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% lor better ) after 15 or more games as the coach of KENTUCKY. CBB Underdogs of 10 to 19.5 points (KENTUCKY) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 26-5 ATS L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors. Kentucky to cover |
|||||||
01-13-23 | Nebraska +16 v. Purdue | 55-73 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Purdue beat Nebraska 65-62 on the road back on Dec 10th and now with revenge on board Im betting the Cornhuskers make a game of this. Just to much of a point swing here not to be on the take. NEBRASKA is 11-3 ATS revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 3 seasons. PURDUE is 3-11 ATS in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. PURDUE is 0-6 ATS in home games after playing a game as favorite this season CBB Underdogs of 10 or more points (NEBRASKA) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 60 points, with just one or fewer starters returning from last season are 65-32 L/5 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors.( Blasted by Illinois last time out in a ugly effort- redemption time ) Play on Nebraska to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Arizona v. Oregon State +15.5 | 86-74 | Win | 100 | 16 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. OSU leads the Pac-12 in free throw percentage at 74.9 percent , key to backing this underdog vs a top tier side. Also Oregon State is shooting 45.4 percent from the floor at home this season, compared to 41.2 percent away from Gill Coliseum. OREGON ST is 14-1 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better) over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (ARIZONA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or more ) playing a team with a losing record are 31-4 ATS L/5 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Oregon State to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Utah +12.5 v. UCLA | 49-68 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 54 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UCLA and Utah are the top 2 scoring defenses in the Pac-12. The Bruins are ranked No.21 nationally, allowing around 60.8 PPG, and the Runnin’ Utes come in at No 26, allowing 61.5 PPG. Utah is 6th in the country in rebounding, UCLA is 197, which Im betting will be a key advantage. Five returning starters for Utah make them very experienced under fire and they wont be flustered tonight at UCLA in game I have pegged to be much closer than the linesmakers line might indicate.
Play on Utah to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | New Mexico State +5 v. Seattle University | 66-69 | Win | 100 | 14 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. For years, WAC Championships have run through Las Cruces and there appeared to be a gulf between NM State and the rest of the league, however, this season it looks as though the rest of the league has finally caught up. But after a 0-4 league start you can bet that New Mexico state will be primed for a all out effort as a 0-5 start would be the worst in their history. NEW MEXICO ST is 11-2 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) after 15 or more games over the last 2 seasons. NEW MEXICO ST is 6-0 ATSin road games after a game where they made 78% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. CBB teams where the line is +3 to -3 (NEW MEXICO ST) - off a home loss against a conference rival against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins are 48-17 L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors. Take the points with New Mexico state to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Northern Colorado v. CS Sacramento -4.5 | 64-72 | Win | 100 | 14 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (SACRAMENTO ST) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a conference rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a bad team (20 to 40%) are 70-5 L/5 seasons for a 93% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at +11 ppg which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on Sacramento to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Northern Kentucky v. Wisc-Milwaukee -1 | 75-80 | Win | 100 | 12 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Milwaukee has proven proficient at both ends of the floor and are playing with alot of confidence, N.Kentucky has their hands full tonight. N KENTUCKY is 0-8 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. KENTUCKY is 0-6 ATS in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WI-MILWAUKEE) - off 2 straight wins against conference rivals, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) are 83-33 L/26 seasons for a 72% conversion rate. Play on Wisconsin Milwaukee to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Tex A&M Commerce -4 v. Houston Christian | 59-68 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make Texas A&M Commerce at -7 favs thus we have value laying this number. HOUSTON CHRISTIAN is 1-7 ATS after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog this season. CBB Home underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (HOUSTON CHRISTIAN) - off 2 consecutive losses of 10 or more to conference rivals, a bad team (20% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record are 28-6 ATS L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate. Play Texas A&M Commerce to cover |
|||||||
01-12-23 | Youngstown State v. Detroit +1.5 | 84-79 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (YOUNGSTOWN ST) - an explosive offensive team ( 76 or better PPG) against a good offensive team (74-76 PPG), after a combined score of 175 points or more are 24-4 L/5 seasons for a 86% conversion rate. Play on Detroit to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | California +12 v. Washington State | 51-66 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. California has played well of late garnering wins in 3 of their L/4, while Washington state is off a huge road win vs Arizona last time out and will be in. major emotional letdown situation tonight vs a side they could easily be over looking.Smith is 0-6 ATS when playing against a sub par team (Win Pct. 20% or less) as the coach of WASHINGTON ST.WASHINGTON ST is 0-7 ATS b in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 season. California to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | TCU v. Texas -5.5 | 75-79 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Texas has won seven of the last eight and 24 of the last 32 meetings against the Horned Frogs entering Wednesday's contest. The Longhorns have won 18 of the last 20 meetings in Austin against TCU. Rinse and repeat. Note: Revenge on board for Longhorns after suffering neutral court tourney loss to TCU last season. Play on Texas to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Tulane v. SMU +5 | 97-88 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Tulane lost both meetings to SMU last season and despite of having revenge on board just dont deserve to be 5 point road favs in a place the program has lost its last 12 visits dating back to 1997. SMU was clobbered in back to back games vs very strong competition Houston and UCF, but now this will seem like a walk in the park compared to that over whelming opp. Play on SMU to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Abilene Christian v. UT-Rio Grande Valley +6.5 | 86-103 | Win | 100 | 14 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UTRGV is 6-0 ATS when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. Play on UTRGV to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Monmouth +20.5 v. Hofstra | 57-77 | Win | 100 | 11 h 16 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hofstra has won five in a row, with four of them decided by a combined 17 points, including a one and two-point game and Im betting Monmouth finds a way to cover here this evening at Hofstra. HOFSTRA is 1-9 ATS in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 45% or less over the last 3 seasons. HOFSTRA is 1-9 ATS in home games against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. HOFSTRA is 0-6 ATS in home games off a win against a conference rival over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road underdogs of 10 or more points (MONMOUTH) - terrible shooting team (40% or less) against an average defensive team (42.5-45%), after a game where a team made 33% of their shots or worse are 31-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Monmouth to cover |
|||||||
01-11-23 | Mississippi State -2 v. Georgia | 50-58 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Through 15 games, the Bulldogs are among the nation's best surrendering 56.7 points per game (2nd SEC o 5th nationally) on a 38.7 opponent field goal per-centage (3rd SEC o 21st nationally).The Bulldogs D, will be the difference maker tonight. Georgia's top scoring duo is Terry Roberts (15.7 PPG, 4.2 APG, 3.8 RPG, 1.9 SPG) and Kario Oquendo (14.1 PPG, 3.8 RPG) are going to have their flow interrupted by an aggressive visitor. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MISSISSIPPI ST) - after being beaten by the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 80%) are 43-18 ATS L/26 seasons for a 71% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Miss state to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Fresno State +3.5 v. San Jose State | 64-74 | Loss | -115 | 13 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. FRESNO ST is 5-0 straight up against SAN JOSE ST over the last 3 seasons. Play on Fresno State to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | North Carolina v. Virginia -5 | 58-65 | Win | 100 | 26 h 15 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Carolina is over rated here vs a Virginia side with revenge on board from last years ugly tournament loss to the Tar Heels. NC is 0-9 ATS L/9 as visitors in this series. Virginia 8-1 ATS L/9 when seeking revenge vs N.Carolina. The Cavaliers returning 5 man corps Im betting will come out on fire tonight in a conclusive redemption win. Virginia to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Oklahoma +10 v. Kansas | 75-79 | Win | 100 | 14 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oklahoma dropped their first game last season 67-64 to Kansas as hosts and then dropped the second 2022 Big 12 meeting against Kansas 71-69 at Allen Fieldhouse last Jan and Im betting another hard fought affair here this season with taking points proving to be golden. OKLAHOMA is 22-11 ATS as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. KANSAS is 2-10 ATS versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (KANSAS) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (80% ore more) playing a good team (60% to 80%) are 16-46 L/5 seasons for a go against 74% conversion rate. Play on Oklahoma to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Seton Hall v. Georgetown +9 | 66-51 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SETON HALL) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 9-42 ATS L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate. Georgetown to cover |
|||||||
01-10-23 | Toledo v. Kent State -3 | 63-75 | Win | 100 | 10 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Toledo has been lighting it up offensively of late and are off scoring 102 points last time out. After that giant output Im betting on immediate regression against a strong program( Kent State). TOLEDO is 3-15 ATS in road games after scoring 80 points or more 3 straight games. KENT ST is 11-1 ATS versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 16-3 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or better of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 8-1 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons Kent State cover |
|||||||
01-09-23 | Florida A&M +15.5 v. Grambling State | 57-62 | Win | 100 | 11 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. McCullum is 9-1 ATS versus excellent teams - shooting 45% or better with a defense of 42% or less as the coach of FLORIDA A&M. McCullum is 15-3 ATS as a road underdog of 12.5 to 18 points as the coach of FLORIDA A&M. GRAMBLING is 1-11 ATSwhen playing against a struggling team (Win Pct. 20% or less) over the last 3 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (GRAMBLING) - average offensive team (67-74 PPG) against a horrible offensive team (63 or less PPG), after scoring 75 points or more 2 straight games are 55-104 ATS L/26 seasons for a 66% go against conversion rate. Play on Florida A&M to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Washington +9.5 v. Arizona State | 65-73 | Win | 100 | 8 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Canisius v. St. Peter's -3 | 67-60 | Loss | -110 | 6 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. ST PETERS is 6-0 ATS as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points over the last 2 seasons. Favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ST PETERS) - a poor offensive team (63-67 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more are 54-5 L/26 seasons for a 92% conversion rare with the average ppg diff clicking in at +7.8 which easily qualifies on this ATS offering. Play on St.Peters to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Ohio State -1.5 v. Maryland | 73-80 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Ohio State comes into the game at 10-4 overall and 2-1 in conference play. The four losses have come at the hands of No. 17 San Diego State, No. 17 Duke, previously No. 1 North Carolina and No. 1 Purdue last time out. OHIO ST is 11-3 ATS after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. MARYLAND is 3-11 ATS in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The Buckeyes are No. 9 in the NET rankings and have the second-most efficient offense in the country and deserve respect here as short road favs. Play on Ohio State to cover |
|||||||
01-08-23 | Iowa v. Rutgers -6.5 | 76-65 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Things dont seem quite right from a chemistry perspective with Iowa basketball. I know they some how found a way to win vs Indiana last time out, in a controversial affair, but this team has issues and now in an emotional letdown spot today against a Rutgers side that plays their best hoops at home Im betting they the Hawkeyes are in trouble. Add in paayback for being eliminated opening round of the Big Ten tourney at the hands of Iowa we have a strong revenge scenario in play. IOWA is 1-8 ATS in road games vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with the average ppg diff registering at -8.8 . RUTGERS is 8-0 ATS in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 8+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at +13.8. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (RUTGERS) - an excellent defensive team (63 or less PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG), after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games are 51-20 ATS L/5 seasons for a 72% conversion rate. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
01-07-23 | Nevada v. San Jose State +2.5 | 67-40 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. San Jose State to cover |
|||||||
01-06-23 | Stanford v. California +8 | 70-92 | Win | 100 | 13 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. California to cover |
|||||||
01-06-23 | Akron +2.5 v. Ball State | 63-70 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Zips swept the series last season, winning 84-74 at The JAR (Jan. 11) and 79-60 at Worthen Arena (March 1). Akron swept the season series in 2021-22, defeating BSU 88-79 (Feb. 19, 2021) at Worthen Arena and winning 74-42 (Jan. 30, 2021) at James A. Rhodes Arena. Akron still matches up vs this version of Ball State and if they lose tonight Im betting they wont fail to cover. Akron is 4-0 SU/ATS L/4 meetings. BALL ST is 0-6 ATS vs. teams who are called for 3+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. Akrons discipline will be the diff maker tonight. Road team is 8-3 ATS in the last 11 meetings. Play on Akron to cover |